How Does Driver Takeover Worsen in a Sudden System Failure of Conditionally Automated Driving?
How Does Driver Takeover Worsen in a Sudden System Failure of Conditionally Automated Driving?
复制标题
有条件自动驾驶系统突然故障时，驾驶员接管情况如何恶化？
DOI：
10.23919/sice48898.2020.9240345
复制
发表时间：
2020
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
M. Itoh
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Hua Yao;Suyang An;Huiping Zhou;M. Itoh
自动驾驶汽车对我们越来越有吸引力。在条件自动驾驶中，一旦车辆遇到系统无法进一步工作的情况，就需要从系统过渡到驾驶员。有两种类型的接管情况。一种是系统故障，在这种情况下，发出干预请求（RTI）后，系统立即被停用。另一种是退出操作设计域（ODD），在这种情况下，系统在RTI发出几秒钟后脱离。在这项研究中，进行了32名参与者的模拟实验。比较了系统故障和ODD退出情况下的驱动接管性能。结果表明，司机的反应显着更快的系统故障条件。两种限制类型在纵向接管绩效上没有显著差异。然而，在系统故障条件下，驾驶员的横向接管性能普遍较差。
Conditionally automated driving is getting extensively attractive to us. Transition from a system to a driver in conditionally automated driving is necessary once the vehicle encounters the situation in which the system cannot work further. There are two types of takeover situations. One is system failure, in which the system is deactivated immediately with issuing a request to intervene (RTI). The other is exit from the operational design domain (ODD), in which the system is disengaged several seconds after the issue of RTI. In this study, a simulator experiment of 32 participants was conducted. The driver takeover performance in system failure condition was compared with that in the ODD exit condition. Results revealed that drivers responded significantly faster in the system failure condition. There was no significant difference of longitudinal takeover performance between the two types of limitations. However, the drivers generally performed worse lateral takeover performance in the system failure conditions.