In Support of the PHAVE Analysis of the Double Object Construction
In Support of the PHAVE Analysis of the Double Object Construction
复制标题
支持双对象构造的 PHAVE 分析
作者：
H. Harley;H. Jung
Pylkkänen (2002, 2008) 和 Bruening (2010a) 提出了一些反对英语中双宾语结构的“小从句”方法的论点，其基础是该提案对所有权转移蕴含、面向目标的描述、名词化、子提取、量词范围和习语的预测。我们认为，Harley（1995，2002）提出的小条款分析实际上在所有这些情况下都做出了正确的预测。此外，我们指出了双宾语结构和单句之间在描述、事件 DP 补语和量词范围方面存在先前被忽视的相似之处。这激发了一种分析，将这些不同的行为与两者共有的单个 PHAVE 元素的属性联系起来。
Pylkkänen (2002, 2008) and Bruening (2010a) present several arguments against the ‘‘small clause’’ approach to the double object construction in English, building on the predictions that that proposal makes with respect to the transfer-of-possession entailment, Goal-oriented depictives, nominalizations, subextraction, quantifier scope, and idioms. We argue that the small clause analysis proposed by Harley (1995, 2002) in fact makes correct predictions in all these cases. In addition, we point out the existence of previously overlooked parallels between double object structures and have-sentences with respect to depictives, eventive DP complements, and quantifier scope. This motivates an analysis that links these different behaviors to the properties of a single PHAVE element common to both.