The self-report psychopathy scale and passive avoidance learning - A validation study of race and gender effects

The self-report psychopathy scale and passive avoidance learning - A validation study of race and gender effects
复制标题

DOI:
10.1177/1073191105284992
复制
发表时间:
2006-06-01
期刊:
影响因子:
3.8
通讯作者:
Epstein, Monica K.
Epstein, Monica K.
中科院分区:
心理学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Epstein, Monica K.

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

在一个非制度化的混合性别和种族的罪犯样本的自我报告精神病量表(SRPS)的信度和效度进行了检查。获得了总样本以及不同性别和种族的足够的α系数。将SRPS与特质焦虑和被动回避错误进行比较。SRPS总分、小学和中学成绩与特质焦虑和被动回避(委托)错误呈显著正相关,但与遗漏错误无关。采用分层回归模型,没有发现焦虑,性别或种族的影响。智力混淆了精神病特征和被动回避错误之间的关系。研究结果提供了初步的支持SRPS作为一个有效的措施精神病。
The reliability and validity of the Self-Report Psychopathy Scale (SRPS) was examined in a noninstitutionalized offender sample of mixed gender and race. Adequate alpha coefficients were obtained for the total sample and across gender and race. The SRPS was compared to measures of trait anxiety and passive avoidance errors. SRPS total, primary, and secondary scores were positively and significantly correlated with trait anxiety and passive avoidance (commission) errors, but not omission errors. Employing hierarchical regression models, no anxiety, gender, or ethnic effects were found. Intelligence confounded the relationship between psychopathic traits and passive avoidance errors. Findings provide tentative support of the SRPS as a valid measure of psychopathy.