Dissociating measures of associative memory: Evidence and theoretical implications

Dissociating measures of associative memory: Evidence and theoretical implications
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.jml.2007.06.006
复制
发表时间:
2007-10-01
影响因子:
4.3
通讯作者:
Moscovitch, Morris
Moscovitch, Morris
中科院分区:
心理学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Cohn, Melanie;Moscovitch, Morris

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

在四个实验中,作者研究了两个措施的联想识别记忆(联想识别和联想恢复)是彼此分离的基础上,他们依赖于战略检索和项目识别记忆是分离的。实验一表明,深编码的关系信息,但不是个别项目,增加了这两种类型的联想记忆显着,这两个措施的索引,而它只略有增加项目记忆。实验2-4表明,一个短的响应期限,一个快速识别和重叠配对条件干扰联想识别,但左联想恢复不受影响。联想复原提供了一种联想记忆的测量,但与联想识别不同,它不太依赖于策略检索过程。我们建议,联想熟悉的基础上,这一措施。这个过程可能在编码时索引信息的绑定,而不涉及在提取时回忆的生动,有意识的重新体验特征。(c)2007年爱思唯尔公司All rights reserved.
In four experiments, the authors investigated whether two measures of associative recognition memory (associative identification and associative reinstatement) are dissociable from one-another on the basis of their reliance on strategic retrieval and are dissociable from item recognition memory. Experiment I showed that deep encoding of relational information, but not of individual items, increased both types of associative memory significantly, as indexed by both measures, while it only marginally increased item memory. Experiments 2-4 showed that a short response deadline, a speeded recognition and an overlapping pairing condition interfered with associative identification, but left associative reinstatement unaffected. Associative reinstatement provides a measure of associative memory, but unlike associative identification, it is less reliant on strategic retrieval processes. We propose that associative familiarity underlies this measure. This process may index binding of information at encoding without involving the vivid, conscious re-experiencing characteristic of recollection at retrieval. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.