Cross-cultural adaptation of the Neck Pain and Disability Scale: a methodological systematic review
Cross-cultural adaptation of the Neck Pain and Disability Scale: a methodological systematic review
复制标题
颈部疼痛和残疾量表的跨文化适应：方法系统评价
DOI：
10.1016/j.spinee.2019.01.007
复制
发表时间：
2019
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Xue-jun Cui
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Min Yao;Bao-ping Xu;Zi-rui Tian;Jie Ye;Ying Zhang;Yong-jun Wang;Xue-jun Cui
背景：颈部疼痛是一种常见的不适症状，对患者的工作和生活产生不利影响。颈部疼痛和残疾量表（NPDS）广泛用于颈部疼痛评估。它已被跨文化改编成几种语言，以扩大其影响力到非英语国家。本研究的目的是全面评估翻译程序和测量性能的跨文化adaptations的NPDS.METHOD：我们检索了多个数据库，包括PubMed，Embase，CINAHL，SciELO，PsycINFO，Medline，SinoMed，PsycINFO，Web of Science，和Scopus，使用关键字“颈部疼痛和残疾量表”，“NPDS”，“跨文化”和“翻译”。由两名评价者按照《自我报告测量跨文化适应过程指南》和《健康状况问卷心理测量特性质量标准》独立进行跨文化适应和适应程序测量特性的质量控制。NPDS有11种不同语言的15个改编版本，有韩语、简体中文和土耳其语的多个版本，有19项研究。在这些研究中，大约有一半进行了正向和反向翻译。特别是，他们大多集中在翻译的综合阶段。由于有专家委员会的存在，只有2011年的中文版符合组成标准。内部一致性，可靠性和结构效度已在大多数现有的合格文章进行了评价。这些文章中有一半测试天花板和地板的影响，只有少数包括协议的响应性和interpretable.CONCLUSION：意大利（出版物1和2），波斯-伊朗，中国-2011年，泰国的适应表现出更好的质量比其他方面的跨文化适应和测量属性。进一步的研究应充分评估荷兰（出版物1和2），印度-印度，韩国-2013，中国-2010，土耳其-2004和土耳其-2007改编的NPDS的测量特性。© 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: Neck pain is a common and uncomfortable symptom, adversely affecting the work and life of those affected. The Neck Pain and Disability Scale (NPDS) is widely used in neck pain assessment. It has been cross-culturally adapted into several languages to extend its reach to non−English-speaking countries. The aim of this study was to comprehensively evaluate the translation procedures and measurement properties of cross-cultural adaptations of the NPDS.METHOD: We searched multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, SciELO, PsycINFO, Medline, SinoMed, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Scopus, using the keywords “Neck Pain and Disability Scale,” “NPDS,” “cross-cultural,” and “translation”. Cross-cultural adaptation and quality control of measurement properties of adaptation procedures were independently conducted by two reviewers in accordance with Guidelines for the Process of Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Self-Report Measures and Quality Criteria for Psychometric Properties of Health Status Questionnaire.RESULTS: There are 15 adaptations of NPDS in 11 different languages with multiple versions in Korean, simplified Chinese and Turkish with 19 studies. In about half of these studies, forward and back translations were conducted. Specially, they mostly focus on the synthesis phase of the translations. Only the simplified-Chinese-2011 adaptation meets the standards of composition due to the existence of an expert committee. Internal consistency, reliability, and construct validity have been evaluated in most existing eligible articles. Half of these articles tested ceiling and floor effects,and only a few included agreement responsiveness and interpretability.CONCLUSION: The Italian (publication 1 and 2), Persian-Iranian, simplified-Chinese-2011, and Thai adaptations show better quality than others with regard to cross-cultural adaptation and measurement properties. Further studies should fully assess the measurement properties of the NPDS in the Dutch (publication 1 and 2), Hindi-Indian, Korean-2013, simplified-Chinese-2010, Turkish-2004,and Turkish-2007 adaptations. © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.