Anthropology as critique of reality
Anthropology as critique of reality
复制标题
作为对现实批判的人类学
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2012
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
A. Morita
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Casper Bruun Jensen;A. Morita
最近在日本出版了由春日直树教授编辑的《Genjitsu Hihan no Jinruigaku》（人类学作为对现实的批判）一书，推动了这一论坛。在日本的背景下，这本书代表了欧美人类学中所谓的“本体论转向”的新兴兴趣。这个论坛提供了一个人类学谱系的描述，导致日本人对“本体论问题”的兴趣，它提供了一个切入点，了解日本的解释，并回应，这一系列的问题和关注。该论坛包括Casper Bruun詹森和盛田敦郎的介绍性文章，概述了日本人类学中导致Genjitsu Hihan no Jinruigaku的历史，詹森对春日教授进行的关于日本人类学背景下他的知识谱系的采访，以及翻译和编辑的人类学作为现实批判的一章，Miho石井的“与事物一起行动：神界形成的自生、真实、偶然。”这些作品之后是Marilyn Strawberry的评论，她的作品为日本转向本体论提供了关键的灵感来源，Annelise Riles与日本人类学有着长期的关系，包括Kasuga教授。
The impetus for this forum was the recent publication in Japan of the volume Genjitsu Hihan no Jinruigaku (Anthropology as critique of reality) edited by Professor Naoki Kasuga. In the Japanese context, this volume represents the emergent interest in what has come to be called the “the ontological turn” in Euro-American anthropology. This forum offers a depiction of the anthropological genealogies that led to the Japanese interest in “ontological matters,” and it offers an entry point for understanding Japanese interpretations of, and responses to, this set of issues and concerns. The forum comprises an introductory piece by Casper Bruun Jensen and Atsuro Morita, outlining the histories within Japanese anthropology that led to Genjitsu Hihan no Jinruigaku, an interview conducted by Jensen with Professor Kasuga on his intellectual genealogy in the context of Japanese anthropology, and a translated and edited chapter from Anthropology as critique of reality, Miho Ishii’s “Acting with things: Self-poiesis, actuality, and contingency in the formation of divine worlds.” These pieces are followed by commentaries from Marilyn Strathern, whose work provides a key source of inspiration for the Japanese turn to ontology, and Annelise Riles, who has had long-standing relations with Japanese anthropology, including Professor Kasuga.