Adverse Childhood Experiences: Beyond Signs of Safety; Reimagining the Organisation and Practice of Social Work with Children and Families
Adverse Childhood Experiences: Beyond Signs of Safety; Reimagining the Organisation and Practice of Social Work with Children and Families
复制标题
不良童年经历：超越安全迹象；
DOI：
10.1093/bjsw/bcz023
复制
发表时间：
2019
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
J. Frederick
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
T. Spratt;J. Devaney;J. Frederick
虽然不良童年经历（ACE）知情的方法，以儿童保护和福利已成为有影响力的美国，它在英国的影响力明显较小，这尽管增长，通过ACE研究的基础上了解人口的需求和政策制定者和其他专业团体之间的服务提供调整。在这篇文章中，我们注意到ACE研究的发展，并得出与儿童和家庭的社会工作的影响。我们认为，目前的组织和实践的当务之急，借鉴的例子，标志的安全计划，再加上反感ACE在某些季度的社会工作学院，有具体化的短期和闭塞的发展中国家的儿童的需求，以阻碍系统的分析和必要的变化，以确保儿童福利制度的重新设计，以满足这些需求。这表明，后肯普时代的儿童福利服务在概念上或系统上不再足以保护儿童超越直接的安全结果，因此，我们需要重新想象他们的未来。
While an adverse childhood experience (ACE)-informed approach to child protection and welfare has become influential in USA, it has had markedly less influence in UK, this despite growth in adoption of ACE research as a basis for understanding population needs and aligning service delivery amongst policymakers and other professional groups. In this article, we note the development of ACE research and draw out implications for social work with children and families. We argue that current organisational and practice preoccupations, drawing on the example of the Signs of Safety programme, together with antipathy to ACEs in some quarters of the social work academy, have the effect of reifying a short-term and occluded view of the developing child’s needs so as to obstruct the systemic analysis and changes necessary to ensure that the child welfare system is redesigned to meet such needs. This suggests that post-Kempe era child welfare services are no longer conceptually or systemically adequate to protect children beyond immediate safety outcomes and consequently we need to reimagine their future.
DOI：
10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00351.x
发表时间：
2005-03-01
影响因子：
7.6
作者：
Appleyard, K;Egeland, B;Sroufe, LA
通讯作者：
Sroufe, LA