Challenging the politics of early intervention: Who’s ‘saving’ children and why

Challenging the politics of early intervention: Who’s ‘saving’ children and why
复制标题

挑战早期干预的政治:谁在“拯救”儿童以及为什么

DOI:
10.1177/1463949118764032
复制
发表时间:
2019
影响因子:
1.2
通讯作者:
N. Archer
N. Archer
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
N. Archer

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

这本书提出了一个幼儿实践的批判性观点,以及它继续剥夺土著群体权力的方式。虽然其范围是全球性的,但文本侧重于澳大利亚,新西兰和加拿大的背景,这些国家正在进行这项尖端工作。虽然研究人员可能会受益于从头到尾的阅读,但第一部分需要新唯物主义的彻底基础,并且在阅读后面的部分之后,可能会更好地理解,并熟悉后殖民理论和本土理论中的一些主要声音。由于文本旨在使理论更实用,从业者熟悉的重新概念化运动将享受第6,7,10和11章,教师教育者特别将受益于彻底阅读第8-11章,以开始解开自己的定居者殖民实践。作为幼儿领域的新兴研究者,我发现文本提供了一个非常需要的理论视角,这是许多文献所缺乏的。
This book presents a critical view of early childhood practice and the ways in which it continues to disempower indigenous groups. Although global in its scope, the text focuses on Australian, New Zealand, and Canadian contexts, where this cutting-edge work is being conducted. While researchers might benefit from a cover-to-cover read, the first section requires a thorough grounding in new materialism and might be better understood, by some, after reading the later sections, and familiarizing themselves with some of the major voices in post-colonial theory and indigenous pedagogies. Because the text aims to make the theoretical more practical, practitioners familiar with the reconceptualizing movement would enjoy chapters 6, 7, 10, and 11, and teacher educators specifically would benefit from a thorough read of chapters 8–11 to begin to untangle their own settler colonial practices. As an emerging researcher in the field of early childhood, I found that the text offered a much needed theoretical perspective, which is lacking in much of the literature.