Practical Experiences of Unsuccessful Hemostasis with Covered Self-Expandable Metal Stent Placement for Post-Endoscopic Sphincterotomy Bleeding.
Practical Experiences of Unsuccessful Hemostasis with Covered Self-Expandable Metal Stent Placement for Post-Endoscopic Sphincterotomy Bleeding.
复制标题
止血性不成功的实用经验,具有覆盖的自膨胀金属支架放置,以用于后镜检查后括约肌切开术出血。
DOI:
10.5946/ce.2020.217
复制
发表时间:
2022-01
影响因子:
2.5
通讯作者:
Kataoka H
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Yoshida M;Inoue T;Naitoh I;Hayashi K;Hori Y;Natsume M;Atsuta N;Kataoka H
We reviewed 7 patients with unsuccessful endoscopic hemostasis using covered self-expandable metal stent (CSEMS) placement for post-endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) bleeding. ES with a medium incision was performed in 6 and with a large incision in 1 patient. All but 1 of them (86%) showed delayed bleeding, warranting second endoscopic therapies followed by CSEMS placement 1–5 days after the initial ES. Subsequent CSEMS placement did not achieve complete hemostasis in any of the patients. Lateral-side incision lines (3 or 9 o’clock) had more frequent bleeding points (71%) than oral-side incision lines (11–12 o’clock; 29%). Additional endoscopic hemostatic procedures with hemostatic forceps, hypertonic saline epinephrine, or hemoclip achieved excellent hemostasis, resulting in complete hemostasis in all patients. These experiences provide an alert: CSEMS placement is not an ultimate treatment for post-ES bleeding, despite its effectiveness. The lateral-side of the incision line, as well as the oral-most side, should be carefully examined for bleeding points, even after the CSEMS placement.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
10.1007/s00464-012-2368-3
发表时间:
2013-01-01
影响因子:
3.1
作者:
Canena, Jorge;Liberato, Manuel;Coutinho, Antonio
通讯作者:
Coutinho, Antonio
影响因子:
7.7
作者:
Loperfido, S;Angelini, G;Fratton, A
通讯作者:
Fratton, A
影响因子:
158.5
作者:
Freeman, ML;Nelson, DB;Pheley, AM
通讯作者:
Pheley, AM
影响因子:
3.1
作者:
Inoue, Tadahisa;Ibusuki, Mayu;Yoneda, Masashi
通讯作者:
Yoneda, Masashi
影响因子:
9.3
作者:
Itoi, T.;Yasuda, I.;Sofuni, A.
通讯作者:
Sofuni, A.