At the Limits of Historical Geography: Reconstructing Aramaean Territories in the West According to the Neo-Assyrian Written Sources
At the Limits of Historical Geography: Reconstructing Aramaean Territories in the West According to the Neo-Assyrian Written Sources
复制标题
在历史地理的限制下:根据新亚述文字资料重建西方的阿拉姆领土
DOI:
10.1163/9789004398535_002
复制
发表时间:
2019
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
A. M. Bagg
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
A. M. Bagg
When Ashurnasirpal ii became the first Assyrian ruler in two hundred years to cross the Euphrates and reach the Mediterranean, during his 9th campaign (between 875 and 867 BCE), the Levant was a conglomerate of independent countries. 1 The Assyrians called the northern part, where Luwian and Aramaean elements coexisted, Ḫatti, whereas the southern part, where West-Semitic languages were spoken, was known as Amurrû. 2 By the end of Tiglath-pileser iii’s reign, after 42 military campaigns in less than one and a half centuries, 3 the entire region was under Assyrian control. Most of the once independent political units were annexed into the Assyrian Empire as provinces, while those remaining could maintain a certain independence in their home-affairs as Assyrian vassals. 4 The Aramaean kingdoms in this region, also called Eber-nāri in late Neo-Assyrian sources, 5 are listed here in geographic order, from north to south: Samʾalla, also known as Bīt-Gabbāri, Iaḫānu/Bīt-Agūsi, Ḫamat/Luḫuti, Ṣupat/Bīt-Ruḫubi, and Dimašqa, also referred to as Ša-imērīšu or Bīt-Ḫazāili. 6 In this context we must also mention the Late Hittite kingdom of Pattinu, 1 Bagg 2011: map 2.8. 2 For the Assyrian perception and naming of the Levant see Bagg 2011: 11–40, as well as the articles “Amurrû” and “Ḫatti” in rgtc 7/1, 11–15 and 95–100 respectively. 3 Bagg 2011: Tab. 4. B, 418–423.