PD-L1 expression in nonclear-cell renal cell carcinoma

PD-L1 expression in nonclear-cell renal cell carcinoma
复制标题

DOI:
10.1093/annonc/mdu445
复制
发表时间:
2014-11-01
期刊:
影响因子:
50.5
通讯作者:
Signoretti, S.
Signoretti, S.
中科院分区:
医学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Choueiri, T. K.;Fay, A. P.;Signoretti, S.

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

程序性死亡配体-1(PD-L1)在非透明细胞肾细胞癌(non-ccRCC)中的表达及其与临床结局的关系尚不清楚。在这项研究中,我们报告了PD-L1表达发生在非ccRCC患者中,这取决于组织学亚型和肿瘤细胞膜与免疫细胞评分。此外,我们发现PD-L1阳性肿瘤患者在非ccRCC中的临床结局似乎更差。非透明细胞RCC(non-ccRCC)中的程序性死亡配体-1(PD-L1)表达及其与临床结局的关系尚不清楚。福尔马林固定石蜡包埋(FFPE)标本来自101例非ccRCC患者。通过免疫组织化学评价肿瘤细胞膜和肿瘤浸润单核细胞(TIMC)中的PD-L1表达。PD-L1肿瘤阳性定义为每千日元5%肿瘤细胞膜染色的份数。对于TIMC中的PD-L1表达,使用基于浸润程度和阳性细胞百分比的组合评分。基线临床病理特征和结果数据[复发时间(TTR)和总生存期(OS)]与PD-L1染色相关。(10.9%)被认为是肿瘤细胞中的PD-L1+:嫌色细胞癌2/36(5.6%),乳头状细胞癌5/50(10%),Xp11.2易位细胞癌3/10(30%),集合管癌1/5(20%)。肿瘤细胞PD-L1阳性(PD-L1+)与肿瘤分期(P = 0.01)、分级(P = 0.03)及生存期(P < 0.001)相关。另一方面,在57例(56.4%)患者中观察到PD-L1阳性:嫌色细胞RCC 13/36(36.1%),乳头状RCC 30/50(60%),Xp11.2易位RCC 9/10(90%)和集合管癌5/5(100%)。在TIMC中PD-L1+患者中观察到OS缩短的趋势(P = 0.08)。肿瘤细胞膜和TIMC细胞中的PD-L1+与较短的TTR相关(分别为P = 0.02和P = 0.03)。在非ccRCC中,PD-L1+肿瘤患者的临床结局似乎较差,尽管仅肿瘤细胞中的PD-L1阳性与较高的肿瘤分期和分级相关。
Programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression in nonclear-cell RCC (non-ccRCC) and its association with clinical outcomes are unknown. In this study, we report that PD-L1 expression occurs in patients with non-ccRCC depending on histology subtype and tumour cell membrane versus immune cell scoring. In addition, we showed that patients with PD-L1-positive tumours appear to have worse clinical outcomes in non-ccRCC .Programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression in nonclear-cell RCC (non-ccRCC) and its association with clinical outcomes are unknown.Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) specimens were obtained from 101 patients with non-ccRCC. PD-L1 expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry in both tumor cell membrane and tumor-infiltrating mononuclear cells (TIMC). PD-L1 tumor positivity was defined as a parts per thousand yen5% tumor cell membrane staining. For PD-L1 expression in TIMC, a combined score based on the extent of infiltrate and percentage of positive cells was used. Baseline clinico-pathological characteristics and outcome data [time to recurrence (TTR) and overall survival (OS)] were correlated with PD-L1 staining.Among 101 patients, 11 (10.9%) were considered PD-L1+ in tumor cells: 2/36 (5.6%) of chromophobe RCC, 5/50 (10%) of papillary RCC, 3/10 (30%) of Xp11.2 translocation RCC and 1/5 (20%) of collecting duct carcinoma. PD-L1 positivity (PD-L1+) in tumor cells was significantly associated with higher stage (P = 0.01) and grade (P = 0.03), as well as shorter OS (P < 0.001). On the other hand, PD-L1 positivity by TIMC was observed in 57 (56.4%) patients: 13/36 (36.1%) of chromophobe RCC, 30/50 (60%) of papillary RCC, 9/10 (90%) of Xp11.2 translocation RCC and 5/5 (100%) of collecting duct carcinoma. A trend toward shorter OS was observed in patients with PD-L1+ in TIMC (P = 0.08). PD-L1+ in both tumor cell membrane and TIMC cells were associated with shorter TTR (P = 0.02 and P = 0.03, respectively).In non-ccRCC, patients with PD-L1+ tumors appear to have worse clinical outcomes, although only PD-L1 positivity in tumor cells is associated with higher tumor stage and grade.