Deliberative impacts: The macro-political uptake of mini-publics
Deliberative impacts: The macro-political uptake of mini-publics
复制标题
DOI：
10.1177/0032329206288152
复制
发表时间：
2006-06-01
影响因子：
2.4
通讯作者：
Dryzek, John S.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Goodin, Robert E.;Dryzek, John S.
民主理论家经常将公民小组、共识会议、规划小组和协商民意调查等协商创新作为他们对协商民主化希望的中心。根据迄今为止的经验，作者描绘了此类小公众可能对“宏观”政治世界产生影响的方式。影响可能以实际制定政策、参与政策过程、为公众辩论提供信息、对提案进行市场测试、公共政策合法化、建立对政策的信心和选民、公众监督和抵制拉拢等形式出现。暴露问题和失败太容易了。作者重点介绍了这些方面的成功案例。
Democratic theorists often place deliberative innovations such as citizen's panels, consensus conferences, planning cells, and deliberative polls at the center of their hopes for deliberative democratization. In light of experience to date, the authors chart the ways in which such mini-publics may have an impact in the "macro" world of politics. Impact may come in the form of actually making policy, being taken up in the policy process, informing public debates, market-testing of proposals, legitimation of public policies, building confidence and constituencies for policies, popular oversight, and resisting co-option. Exposing problems and failures is all too easy. The authors highlight cases of success on each of these dimensions.