Twenty priorities for future social-ecological research on climate resilience

Twenty priorities for future social-ecological research on climate resilience
复制标题

DOI:
10.1088/1748-9326/abb157
复制
发表时间:
2020-10-01
影响因子:
6.7
通讯作者:
Milner-Gulland, E. J.
Milner-Gulland, E. J.
中科院分区:
环境科学与生态学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Beauchamp, Emilie;Hirons, Mark;Milner-Gulland, E. J.

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

面对全球气候危机和未来不可避免的气候冲击,增强社会生态复原力已成为国际上研究和政策的紧迫领域。更好地了解气候冲击的影响和应对措施的研究对于提高受影响人群和地区的抵御能力和福祉至关重要。本文以该主题的焦点集的发现为基础,为气候复原力社会生态研究的未来提供结论性和前瞻性的视角。通过专家研讨会来确定研究差距,我们确定了未来气候复原力研究的 20 个优先事项。这些涵盖四个关键主题:系统和规模、治理和知识、气候适应力和发展以及部门关注。鉴于采取基于证据的政策来应对气候危机的必要性和紧迫性,该分析认为了解如何在政策中使用社会生态复原力的发现的重要性,而不是仅仅关注它是如何产生的。许多优先事项都强调气候研究产生、理解和使用的治理系统。我们进一步反思了当前证据生成过程的状况,强调更广泛的声音参与气候适应力研究的设计、实施和传播对于制定其旨在支持的高效和公平的干预措施至关重要。
Faced with the global climate crisis and the inevitability of future climate shocks, enhancing social-ecological resilience has become an urgent area for research and policy internationally. Research to better understand the impacts of, and response to, climate shocks is critical to improve the resilience and well-being of affected people and places. This paper builds on the findings of a focus collection on this topic to provide a concluding and forward-looking perspective on the future of social-ecological research on climate resilience. Drawing on an expert workshop to identify research gaps, we distinguish 20 priorities for future research on climate resilience. These span four key themes: Systems and Scales, Governance and Knowledge, Climate Resilience and Development, and Sectoral Concerns. Given the need and urgency for evidence-based policies to address the climate crisis, the analysis considers the importance of understanding how findings on social-ecological resilience are used in policy, rather than solely focusing on how it is generated. Many of the priorities emphasise the governance systems within which climate research is produced, understood and used. We further reflect on the state of current evidence generation processes, emphasising that the involvement of a wider range of voices in the design, implementation and dissemination of climate resilience research is critical to developing the efficient and fair interventions it is meant to support.