Smoking motives of daily and non-daily smokers: A profile analysis
Smoking motives of daily and non-daily smokers: A profile analysis
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.05.037
复制
发表时间：
2012-12-01
影响因子：
4.2
通讯作者：
Tindle, Hilary A.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Shiffman, Saul;Dunbar, Michael S.;Tindle, Hilary A.
背景：非日常或间歇性吸烟越来越普遍，但人们对间歇性吸烟者 (ITS) 的吸烟模式知之甚少。本研究评估了非日常吸烟者、ITS 吸烟者和日常吸烟者 (DS) 吸烟动机特征的差异。方法：参与者为 218 名 DS 和 252 名 ITS（其中 152 名转换 ITS [CITS] 以前每天吸烟，80 名本地 ITS [NITS] 不吸烟），目前尚未戒烟，通过广告招募。 ITS 定义为每月吸烟 4-27 天； DS为每天吸烟，每天5-30支烟。参与者完成了威斯康星州吸烟依赖动机调查表 (WISDM)，得出 13 种不同动机的分数。轮廓内标准差表示轮廓分散度（动机之间的差异），轮廓形状是根据轮廓内平均值和标准差标准化的分数来评估的。结果：ITS 和 DS 之间的轮廓分散度没有差异。 ITS 和 DS 的标准化得分概况有所不同，DS 在宽容、渴望、自动化、失控和行为选择动机方面得分较高，而 ITS 在提示暴露、体重控制和积极强化动机方面得分较高。 CITS 与 NITS 在轮廓分散度或轮廓形状方面没有差异。结论：ITS 与 DS 的不同之处在于动机的相对重要性，ITS 强调与急性、情景吸烟相关的动机，而 DS 强调与依赖相关的动机。在 ITS 中，日常吸烟史并不影响动机。 (C) 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. 保留所有权利。
Background: Non-daily or intermittent smoking is becoming common, but little is known about smoking patterns of intermittent smokers (ITS). This study assesses differences in the profile of smoking motives of non-daily, ITS and daily smokers (DS).Methods: Participants were 218 DS and 252 ITS (152 converted ITS [CITS], who previously smoked daily, and 80 native ITS [NITS] who did not), not currently quitting, recruited by advertisement. ITS were defined as smoking 4-27 days per month; DS as smoking daily, 5-30 cigarettes per day. Participants completed the Wisconsin Inventory of Smoking Dependence Motives (WISDM), yielding scores for 13 different motives. The within-profile standard deviation expressed profile scatter (differentiation among motives), and profile shape was assessed on scores standardized for within-profile mean and standard deviation.Results: There was no difference between ITS and DS on profile scatter. ITS and DS differed in the shape of the standardized score profile, with DS scoring higher on Tolerance, Craving, Automaticity, Loss of Control and Behavioral Choice motives, and ITS scoring higher on Cue Exposure, Weight Control, and Positive Reinforcement motives. CITS did not differ from NITS in profile scatter or profile shape.Conclusion: ITS differ from DS in the relative importance of motives, with ITS emphasizing motives associated with acute, situational smoking, and DS emphasizing dependence-related motives. Among ITS, history of daily smoking did not influence the profile of motives. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.