G-Mode Classification of Trans Neptunian Objects
G-Mode Classification of Trans Neptunian Objects
复制标题
海王星外天体的 G 模式分类
DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2006
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
A. Gavrishin
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
M. D. Sanctis;A. Coradini;A. Gavrishin
Introduction: TNO population show a wide colour diversity. Now is quite widely accepted that the colour diversity is a real characteristics of the outer solar system population and not an observational bias. Colors range from blue to very red but the how is colour distribution of TNOs is under debate. Since the population is characterized by several parameters, reflecting the different phenomena, it is important to use a multivariate statistics in order to understand if different types of objects exist. In what follows we will describe first the characteristic of the population, and then we will describe the strategy needed to tackle this problem. TNOs Data Sample: We make a statistical analysis using the data of 81 Kuiper Belt objects. We chosen our sample among the KBOs with well known dynamical elements: all the objects have been chosen between those with calculated proper elements (that means two or more oppositions) [1] . The parameters used in our statistical analysis are: colour index B-V and V-R, magnitude H, orbital inclination i, orbital eccentricity e, and semimajor axes a. The colors are taken from different published data. G-mode: We used the G-mode multivariate statistical approach to analyse this data set The G-mode method was developed by A. Gavrishin and A. Coradini [2]. As a clustering method, the G-mode allows the user to classify a statistical universe described by N samples, each depending on M variables, into homogeneous taxonomic units, considering the instrumental errors, and, if present, to eliminate redundant variables. Another advantage of the method is that different levels of classification can be performed. Once the first quasi-homogeneous groups are found, further analysis can usually subdivide them in homogeneous classes. At this point, it is also possible to recognize the level of similarity and differences between classes. Results: We applied the G-mode method to our sample the conditions of 99.5% of confidence level. G-mode analysis separates the 81 objects of our sample in five groups, well separated for the dynamical parameters and less separated in colours. Four of the five type, 1, 2, 4, and 5, are well separated in dynamical parameters while type 3 show a wide range of parameters and is superimposed to type 1 and 2 (fig.1). Types 4 and 5 results as the more extreme in terms of semi major axes (average a = 58.3 and a = 89.4 for type 4 and 5 respectively).