A Prospective Comparison of Two Measures of Psychopathy in the Prediction of Institutional Misconduct
A Prospective Comparison of Two Measures of Psychopathy in the Prediction of Institutional Misconduct
复制标题
DOI：
10.1002/bsl.823
复制
发表时间：
2008-01-01
影响因子：
1.4
通讯作者：
Patrick, Christopher J.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Edens, John F.;Poythress, Norman G.;Patrick, Christopher J.
本研究检验了两种广泛使用的心理变态特征测量方法的预测有效性，即心理变态检查表修订版（PCL-R；Hare，2003）和心理变态人格量表（PPI；Lilienfeld & Andrews，1996）。获得了监狱囚犯的年轻成人样本（N = 46）的机构违规记录，并在执行这两个量表后对他们进行了大约两年的跟踪。 PPI 总计和两个因子得分预测了违规总数（r 范围为 0.28 至 0.36）。 PPI 因子 I 显示了与非攻击性违规行为更强关联的一些证据 (r = .36)，而 PPI 因子 II 与攻击性不当行为的相关性最强 (r = .24)。 PCL-R 的总分和方面得分不能显着预测任何形式的机构不当行为，其影响大小从可忽略到很小（中位数 r = 0.14，r 范围为 -0.01 至 0.21）。版权所有 ((c) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
This study examined the predictive validity of two widely used measures of psychopathic traits, the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R; Hare, 2003) and the Psychopathic Personality Inventory (PPI; Lilienfeld & Andrews, 1996). Records of institutional infractions were obtained for a young adult sample of prison inmates (N = 46), who were followed for approximately two years following administration of these two scales. The PPI total and two factor scores predicted the total number of infractions committed (r ranging from .28 to.36). PPI Factor I showed some evidence of stronger associations with non-aggressive infractions (r = .36), whereas PPI Factor II was the strongest correlate of aggressive misconduct (r = .24). The total and facet scores of the PCL-R were not significantly predictive of any form of institutional misconduct, with effect sizes ranging from negligible to small (median r = .14, r ranging from -.01 to .21). Copyright ((c) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.