Scoping studies: advancing the methodology.

Scoping studies: advancing the methodology.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1186/1748-5908-5-69
复制
发表时间:
2010-09-20
期刊:
Implementation science : IS
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
O'Brien KK
O'Brien KK
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Levac D;Colquhoun H;O'Brien KK

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

范围研究是审查健康研究证据的一种越来越流行的方法。2005年,Arksey和O 'Malley发表了第一个进行范围界定研究的方法框架。虽然该框架为范围界定研究方法提供了良好的基础,但进一步澄清和加强该框架将有助于支持作者进行和报告范围界定研究的一致性,并可能鼓励研究人员和临床医生参与这一过程。我们利用Arksey和O 'Malley方法进行三次范围研究的经验,提出澄清和加强框架每个阶段的建议。建议包括:明确研究目的与研究问题的联系(第一阶段);平衡可行性与范围界定过程的广度和全面性(第二阶段);使用迭代团队方法选择研究(第三阶段)和提取数据(第四阶段);结合数字摘要和定性专题分析,报告结果,并考虑研究结果对政策、实践或研究的影响(第五阶段);以及将与利益攸关方的协商作为范围界定研究方法的必要知识转化组成部分(第六阶段)。最后,我们提出了范围界定研究方法的其他考虑因素,以支持范围界定研究在健康研究中的进步、应用和相关性。针对Arksey和O 'Malley框架的每个阶段概述了澄清和增强这种方法的具体建议。关于范围界定研究方法的持续辩论和发展将有助于最大限度地提高范围界定研究结果在医疗保健研究和实践中的有用性和严谨性。
Scoping studies are an increasingly popular approach to reviewing health research evidence. In 2005, Arksey and O'Malley published the first methodological framework for conducting scoping studies. While this framework provides an excellent foundation for scoping study methodology, further clarifying and enhancing this framework will help support the consistency with which authors undertake and report scoping studies and may encourage researchers and clinicians to engage in this process. We build upon our experiences conducting three scoping studies using the Arksey and O'Malley methodology to propose recommendations that clarify and enhance each stage of the framework. Recommendations include: clarifying and linking the purpose and research question (stage one); balancing feasibility with breadth and comprehensiveness of the scoping process (stage two); using an iterative team approach to selecting studies (stage three) and extracting data (stage four); incorporating a numerical summary and qualitative thematic analysis, reporting results, and considering the implications of study findings to policy, practice, or research (stage five); and incorporating consultation with stakeholders as a required knowledge translation component of scoping study methodology (stage six). Lastly, we propose additional considerations for scoping study methodology in order to support the advancement, application and relevance of scoping studies in health research. Specific recommendations to clarify and enhance this methodology are outlined for each stage of the Arksey and O'Malley framework. Continued debate and development about scoping study methodology will help to maximize the usefulness and rigor of scoping study findings within healthcare research and practice.
DOI: 10.1177/1049732305276687
发表时间: 2005-11-01
影响因子: 3.2
作者:
Hsieh, HF;Shannon, SE
通讯作者: Shannon, SE
DOI: 10.1097/pep.0b013e3181beb09d
发表时间: 2009-12-01
影响因子: 1.6
作者:
Levac, Danielle;Wishart, Laurie;Wright, Virginia
通讯作者: Wright, Virginia
DOI: 10.1186/1478-4505-6-7
发表时间: 2008-07-09
影响因子: 4
作者:
Anderson, Stuart;Allen, Pauline;Goodwin, Nick
通讯作者: Goodwin, Nick
DOI: 10.1007/s10461-009-9528-z
发表时间: 2010-04-01
期刊: AIDS AND BEHAVIOR
影响因子: 4.4
作者:
O'Brien, Kelly;Wilkins, Annette;Solomon, Patricia
通讯作者: Solomon, Patricia
DOI: 10.3233/wor-2010-0998
发表时间: 2010-01-01
影响因子: 2.3
作者:
Rumrill, Phillip D.;Fitzgerald, Shawn M.;Merchant, William R.
通讯作者: Merchant, William R.