The choice of examiner patent citations for refusals: evidence from the trilateral offices
The choice of examiner patent citations for refusals: evidence from the trilateral offices
复制标题
审查员驳回专利引证的选择:来自三边局的证据
DOI:
10.1007/s11192-018-2885-5
复制
发表时间:
2018
期刊:
影响因子:
3.9
通讯作者:
Tetsuo Wada
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Huang;F.;Kunimitsu,Y.;Tetsuo Wada
Utilizing a novel methodology based on international family-to-family patent citation data, this paper directly compares X/Y patent citations (i.e., those cited as grounds for rejections, equivalent to “blocking patents” in the US) between major patent offices. Remarkable discrepancies between the offices were revealed, despite the common patentability criteria of novelty and inventive step to generate citations. This paper then introduces a simple cosine similarity measurement between a family of X/Y patent citations and all citations added globally to the same original application. How the discrepancies of X/Y patent citations at the European Patent Office (EPO) and the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) relate to the characteristics of applications and longitudinal aspects of office actions were also examined. X/Y patent citations from both the EPO and USPTO commonly show that the range of patent application classes is positively correlated with divergent reasons for refusal, suggesting that costly examinations lead to diversified X/Y patent citations. One novel methodological feature of this paper is that examiner citations across jurisdictions are comparable if we employ family-to-family citations and common criteria for the X/Y citation category. Furthermore, unlike the normal citation-generating process where a citing document adds citations to prior art only once, this paper represents the first attempt to analyze a citation network with multiple citing opportunities from separate parties. We find that the variance of citation linkages has a negative relationship with the ease in which different citers evaluate prior art in the same way, thereby providing a new perspective on the notion of breadth in citation impact.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
3.9
作者:
Wada T
通讯作者:
Wada T
DOI:
10.2139/ssrn.3024621
发表时间:
2017-11
期刊:
US Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO) Economic Research Paper Series
影响因子:
--
作者:
Qiang Lu;Amanda F. Myers;Scott Beliveau
通讯作者:
Qiang Lu;Amanda F. Myers;Scott Beliveau
DOI:
10.4337/9781784713546.73
发表时间:
2017
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
H. Hestermeyer
通讯作者:
H. Hestermeyer
DOI:
10.2139/ssrn.2702637
发表时间:
2015
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
Stuart J. H. Graham;Alan C. Marco;Richard D. Miller
通讯作者:
Richard D. Miller
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2017
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
Koshi Tomoya;Iwase Eiji;Tetsuo Wada
通讯作者:
Tetsuo Wada