Are physical measures related to patient-centred outcomes in ARDS survivors?
Are physical measures related to patient-centred outcomes in ARDS survivors?
复制标题
DOI:
10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-209400
复制
发表时间:
2017-10
期刊:
影响因子:
10
通讯作者:
Needham DM
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Chan KS;Aronson Friedman L;Dinglas VD;Hough CL;Shanholtz C;Ely EW;Morris PE;Mendez-Tellez PA;Jackson JC;Hopkins RO;Needham DM
To inform selection of physical measures for studies of ARDS survivors within 12 months of ARDS Secondary analysis of data from 6-month survivors participating in a U.S. multicenter prospective study (ARDSNet Long-Term Outcome Study [ALTOS], N=134) or a multi-site prospective study in Baltimore, MD (Improving Care of Acute Lung Injury Patients [ICAP], N=99). Physical measures, assessed at 6-month follow-up, were categorized according to the World Health Organization’s International Classification of Disability and Health: body functions and structures, activity, and participation. Patient-centered outcomes were evaluated at 6 and 12-months: survival, hospitalization, alive at home status, and health-related quality of life. Pearson correlation, linear and logistic regression models were used to quantify associations of physical measures with patient-centered outcomes. No 6-month body functions and structures measure demonstrated consistent association with 6- or 12-month outcomes in multivariable regression. The 6-minute walk test, an activity measure, was associated with 6-month SF-36 physical component scores (PCS, beta range: 0.99 to 1.52, p<0.05). Participation measures (Functional Performance Inventory, FPI; Instrumental Activities of Daily Living, IADLs) were associated with SF-36 PCS (beta range: FPI, 1.51 to 1.52; IADL, −1.88 to −1.32; all p<0.05) and Euro-QoL-5D utility score (beta range: FPI, 2.00 to 3.67; IADL, −2.89 to −2.50; all p<0.01) at 6- and 12-months. Participation measures better reflect patient quality-of-life than measures of body functions and structures within 12 months of ARDS among 6-month survivors, and are recommended for inclusion as a core measure in future studies.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
8.8
作者:
Fan E;Dowdy DW;Colantuoni E;Mendez-Tellez PA;Sevransky JE;Shanholtz C;Himmelfarb CR;Desai SV;Ciesla N;Herridge MS;Pronovost PJ;Needham DM
通讯作者:
Needham DM
DOI:
10.1164/rccm.201401-0158oc
发表时间:
2014-05-15
影响因子:
24.7
作者:
Needham, Dale M.;Wozniak, Amy W.;Hopkins, Ramona O.
通讯作者:
Hopkins, Ramona O.
影响因子:
38.9
作者:
Angus, DC;Carlet, J
通讯作者:
Carlet, J
影响因子:
158.5
作者:
Herridge, Margaret S.;Tansey, Catherine M.;Cheung, Angela M.
通讯作者:
Cheung, Angela M.
影响因子:
24.3
作者:
Kon, Samantha S. C.;Canavan, Jane L.;Man, William D-C.
通讯作者:
Man, William D-C.