The Diagnostic Accuracy of Transabdominal and Transvaginal Color Doppler Ultrasound for Pregnant Women with Vasa Previa and Velamentous Cord Insertion.
The Diagnostic Accuracy of Transabdominal and Transvaginal Color Doppler Ultrasound for Pregnant Women with Vasa Previa and Velamentous Cord Insertion.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1155/2022/1685783
复制
发表时间:
2022
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Liu, Peiwu
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Liu, Qing;Zhang, Qiang;Liu, Peiwu
The objective of this study is to evaluate feasibility and accuracy of transabdominal color Doppler ultrasound (TA-CDUS) and transvaginal color Doppler ultrasound (TV-CDUS) as screening methods for pregnant women with vasa previa (VP) and velamentous cord insertion (VCI). A retrospective diagnostic accuracy study was performed on 5,434 pregnant women from 2018 to 2021, who underwent both TA-CDUS and TV-CDUS. Diagnostic performance of TA-CDUS and TV-CDUS was determined using specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), accuracy, and positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+ and LR−), using the delivery information (gross examination) as the “Gold-standard”. Patient records were reviewed for demographics and diagnosis. The combination of VP and VCI was diagnosed in 37/5434 (0.68%) women at delivery. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and overall test accuracy of TA-CDUS were 72.97%, 99.85%, 77.14%, 99.81%, and 99.67%, respectively, for diagnosing VP with VCI. The corresponding values for TV-CDUS were 89.19%, 99.87%, 82.50%, 99.93%, and 99.80%, respectively. Moreover, the sensitivity of combination of TA-CDUS and TA-CDUS in determining VP with VCI was 97.30%, specificity 99.98%, PPV 97.30%, NPV 99.98%, and accuracy 99.96%. No significant difference in the misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis was found between the examination by TA-CDUS and TV-CDUS. Both TA-CDUS and TV-CDUS can be acceptable diagnostic tools for assessment of pregnant women with VP and VCI, with a better application of TV-CDUS with higher accuracy. The combination of TA-CDUS and TV-CDUS could provide an objective imaging basis for choosing clinical treatment strategies and predicting prognosis.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
--
作者:
通讯作者:
--
DOI:
10.1016/s0301-2115(98)00026-8
发表时间:
1998-07-01
期刊:
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY
影响因子:
--
作者:
Baschat, AA;Gembruch, U
通讯作者:
Gembruch, U
影响因子:
7.1
作者:
Chaoui, R;Tennstedt, C;Bollmann, R
通讯作者:
Bollmann, R
影响因子:
7.1
作者:
Hasegawa, J.;Matsuoka, R.;Okai, T.
通讯作者:
Okai, T.
DOI:
10.1080/14767058.2021.1960975
发表时间:
2021-08-09
影响因子:
1.8
作者:
Kamijo, Kyosuke;Miyamoto, Tsutomu;Shiozawa, Tanri
通讯作者:
Shiozawa, Tanri