Comparing the predictive validity of five cigarette dependence questionnaires
Comparing the predictive validity of five cigarette dependence questionnaires
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.09.011
复制
发表时间：
2010-03-01
影响因子：
4.2
通讯作者：
Etter, Jean-Francois
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Courvoisier, Delphine S.;Etter, Jean-Francois
背景资料：目的：探讨香烟依赖量表（CDS）、尼古丁依赖测验（FTND）、吸烟指数（HSI）和尼古丁依赖综合征量表（NDSS）的长短版对戒烟的预测作用。在8天（N=456）和31天（N=486）后进行随访调查。我们评估的能力，依赖评级预测戒烟，控制信心和意图戒烟。结果：所有的依赖量表是显着的预测戒烟在8天的后续行动，与CDS是最好的预测（OR：3.98每SD单位，15%的方差解释）。结果相似，但在打算戒烟的受访者中更强（OR：6.68，解释了26%的方差）。在31天的后续行动中，只有FTND，HSI和NDSS连续性子量表仍然显着，虽然弱，预测禁欲（OR：1.56，2%的方差解释）。结论：在审查的规模，CDS有最好的预测效度后8天。31天后，没有一个量表能解释超过2%的禁欲方差。(C)2009爱思唯尔爱尔兰有限公司保留所有权利。
Background: To determine whether the long and short versions of the Cigarette Dependence Scale (CDS), the Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND), the Heaviness of Smoking Index (HSI) and the Nicotine Dependence Syndrome Scale (NDSS) predicted smoking abstinence.Method: We collected data via Internet in 2004-2007 in 2343 current smokers. Follow-up surveys were conducted after 8 days (N=456) and 31 days (N=486). We assessed the ability of dependence ratings to predict smoking abstinence, controlling for confidence and intention to quit smoking.Results: All dependence scales were significant predictors of smoking abstinence at the 8-day follow-up, with the CDS being the best predictor (OR: 3.98 per SD unit, 15% of variance explained). Results were similar but stronger among respondents intending to quit (OR: 6.68, 26% of variance explained). At the 31-day follow-up, only the FTND, HSI and NDSS Continuity subscale were still significant, albeit weak, predictors of abstinence (OR: 1.56, 2% of variance explained).Conclusion: Among the scales under scrutiny, the CDS had the best predictive validity after 8 days. None of the scales explained more than 2% of the variance in abstinence after 31 days. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.