The effect of socioeconomic status on informal caregiving for parents among adult married females: evidence from China.

The effect of socioeconomic status on informal caregiving for parents among adult married females: evidence from China.
复制标题

社会经济地位对成年已婚女性父母非正式照顾的影响:来自中国的证据

DOI:
10.1186/s12877-021-02094-0
复制
发表时间:
2021-03-06
期刊:
影响因子:
4.1
通讯作者:
Zhou C
Zhou C
中科院分区:
医学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Wang Y;Li J;Ding L;Feng Y;Tang X;Sun L;Zhou C

文献摘要

参考文献

相似文献

已婚女性照顾者比其他照顾者面临更高的非正式照顾负担风险。没有研究探讨社会经济地位(SES)对中国已婚女性照顾者提供的非正式照顾强度的影响。本研究的目的是实证检验中国已婚女性照顾者的社会经济地位如何影响其对父母/公婆的非正式照顾强度。本研究的数据来自中国健康与营养调查(CHNS)的8次调查。受访者是已婚妇女,其父母/公婆需要照顾,并与他们住在同一个城市。社会经济地位是根据四个指标定义的:教育、经济状况、就业状况和户口(中国的户籍制度)。非正式照顾者分为三类:非照顾者(0小时/周),低强度的照顾者(小于10小时/周),和高强度的照顾者(10小时/周及以上)。多元Logistic回归分析被用来检查SES之间的关系和可能性的低强度和高强度的已婚女性照顾者,调整年龄,家庭特征和调查波。在2661名受访者中,高强度和低强度照顾者分别占16.35%和21.27%。多项逻辑回归结果显示,高强度照顾者与非照顾者的可能性随着照顾者的教育程度增加而增加(p < 0.05),高经济地位与高强度照顾者的可能性相关,但这种关系仅在10%的水平上显着。城市女性提供低强度护理的可能性是农村女性的1.34倍(p < 0.05),提供高强度护理的可能性是农村女性的1.33倍(p < 0.05)。就业女性提供低强度护理的可能性是失业女性的1.25倍(p < 0.05)。高强度照顾者和低强度照顾者的SES存在差异。具有高教育程度和城市户口的妇女更有可能提供高强度的非正式护理,而就业和具有城市户口的妇女更有可能提供低强度护理。在线版本包含补充材料,可通过10.1186/s12877-021-02094-0获得。
Married female caregivers face a higher risk of an informal care burden than other caregivers. No study has explored the effect of socioeconomic status (SES) on the intensity of informal care provided by married female caregivers in China. The purpose of this study is to empirically examine how the SES of married female caregivers affects the intensity of the informal care they provide for their parents/parents-in-law in China. The data for this study were drawn from 8 waves of the China Health and Nutrition Survey (CHNS). The respondents were married women whose parents/parents-in-law needed care and lived in the same city as them. SES was defined based on four indicators: education, economic status, employment status, and hukou (China’s household registration system). Informal caregivers were divided into three categories: non-caregivers (0 h/week), low-intensity caregivers (less than 10 h/week), and high-intensity caregivers (10 h/week and above). Multinomial logistic regression analysis was used to examine the relation between SES and the likelihood of a low- and high-intensity caregiving among married female caregivers, adjusting for age, family characteristics and survey wave. Of the 2661 respondents, high-intensity and low-intensity caregivers accounted for 16.35 and 21.27%, respectively. The multinomial logistic regression results showed that the likelihood of being a high-intensity caregiver versus (vs. a non-caregiver) increased as the caregiver’s educational attainment increased (p < 0.05), and that high economic status was related to the likelihood of being a high-intensity caregiver, but this relationship was only significant at the 10% level. Urban females were 1.34 times more likely than their rural counterparts to provide low-intensity care vs. no care (p < 0.05) and were 1.33 times more likely to provide high-intensity care vs. no care (p < 0.05). Employed females were 1.25 times more likely than those unemployed females to provide low-intensity care vs. no care (p < 0.05). Differences in SES were found between high-intensity caregivers and low-intensity caregivers. Women with high educational attainment and urban hukou were more likely to provide high-intensity informal care, and women who were employed and had urban hukou were more likely to provide low-intensity care. The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-021-02094-0.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05787.x
发表时间: 2012-04-01
影响因子: 3.8
作者:
Kim, Heejung;Chang, Mido;Kim, Sunha
通讯作者: Kim, Sunha
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.11.051
发表时间: 2014-02-01
影响因子: 5.4
作者:
Jacobs, Josephine C.;Laporte, Audrey;Coyte, Peter C.
通讯作者: Coyte, Peter C.
DOI: 10.1093/gerona/glaa017
发表时间: 2020-08-01
影响因子: 5.1
作者:
Jacob, Louis;Oh, Hans;Koyanagi, Ai
通讯作者: Koyanagi, Ai
DOI: 10.2307/1910997
发表时间: 1984-01-01
期刊: ECONOMETRICA
影响因子: 6.1
作者:
HAUSMAN, J;MCFADDEN, D
通讯作者: MCFADDEN, D
DOI: 10.1080/1350485032000056873
发表时间: 2003-06-10
影响因子: 1.6
作者:
Carmichael, F;Charles, S
通讯作者: Charles, S