Does Cross-Race Contact Improve Cross-Race Face Perception? A Meta-Analysis of the Cross-Race Deficit and Contact
Does Cross-Race Contact Improve Cross-Race Face Perception? A Meta-Analysis of the Cross-Race Deficit and Contact
复制标题
DOI：
10.1177/01461672211024463
复制
发表时间：
2021-06-26
影响因子：
4
通讯作者：
Correll, Joshua
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Singh, Balbir;Mellinger, Christopher;Correll, Joshua
与种族外群体的接触被认为可以减少跨种族识别缺陷（CRD），即人们识别同一种族的倾向（即，内组）比跨种族（即，外群）的面孔。2001年，迈斯纳和布里格姆进行了一项荟萃分析，他们检查了这个问题，发现荟萃分析效应r =-0.13。我们基于20年的额外数据进行了一项新的荟萃分析，以更新对这种关系的估计，并研究这种影响的理论和方法调节因素。我们发现荟萃分析效应r =-0.15。与理论预测一致，我们发现一些证据表明，当接触发生在童年而不是成年时，这种关系的程度更强。我们没有发现任何证据表明，整体/神经处理的措施与正常处理的关系不同。最后，我们发现，这种关系的大小取决于接触的操作化，当接触被操纵时，这种关系是最强的。我们考虑对这一主题进行进一步研究的建议。
Contact with racial outgroups is thought to reduce the cross-race recognition deficit (CRD), the tendency for people to recognize same-race (i.e., ingroup) faces more accurately than cross-race (i.e., outgroup) faces. In 2001, Meissner and Brigham conducted a meta-analysis in which they examined this question and found a meta-analytic effect of r = -.13. We conduct a new meta-analysis based on 20 years of additional data to update the estimate of this relationship and examine theoretical and methodological moderators of the effect. We find a meta-analytic effect of r = -.15. In line with theoretical predictions, we find some evidence that the magnitude of this relationship is stronger when contact occurs during childhood rather than adulthood. We find no evidence that the relationship differs for measures of holistic/configural processing compared with normal processing. Finally, we find that the magnitude of the relationship depends on the operationalization of contact and that it is strongest when contact is manipulated. We consider recommendations for further research on this topic.