Legitimacy in Policing : A Systematic Review
Legitimacy in Policing : A Systematic Review
复制标题
警务合法性:系统审查
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2013
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
M. Manning
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Lorraine Mazerolle;Sarah Bennett;Jacqueline Davis;E. Sargeant;M. Manning
警方需要公众的自愿合作才能有效地控制犯罪和维持秩序。研究表明，当公民认为警察是合法的时，他们更有可能遵守和配合警察并遵守法律。警察用来提高公民对合法性的看法的最常见途径是通过使用程序正义。如文献所述，程序正义包括四个基本组成部分。这些因素包括：在当局做出决定（或发出声音）之前公民参与诉讼程序，当局在做出决定时的中立性，当局在整个互动过程中是否表现出对公民的尊严和尊重，以及当局是否传达了值得信赖的动机。世界各地的警察部门都在将这四项程序正义原则（以尊严和尊重对待人民，在遭遇时让公民“发言权”，在决策中保持中立，以及传达值得信赖的动机）的对话隐式或明确地编织到其警务计划和干预措施中
Police require voluntary cooperation from the general public to be effective in controlling crime and maintaining order. Research shows that citizens are more likely to comply and cooperate with police and obey the law when they view the police as legitimate. The most common pathway that the police use to increase citizen perceptions of legitimacy is through the use of procedural justice. Procedural justice, as described in the literature, comprises four essential components. These components are citizen participation in the proceedings prior to an authority reaching a decision (or voice), perceived neutrality of the authority in making the decision, whether or not the authority showed dignity and respect toward citizens throughout the interaction, and whether or not the authority conveyed trustworthy motives. Police departments throughout the world are implicitly and explicitly weaving the dialogue of these four principles of procedural justice (treating people with dignity and respect, giving citizens “voice” during encounters, being neutral in decision making, and conveying trustworthy motives) into their operational policing programs and interventions