INTEREVENT DIFFERENCES IN EVENT MEMORY - WHY ARE SOME EVENTS MORE RECALLABLE THAN OTHERS

INTEREVENT DIFFERENCES IN EVENT MEMORY - WHY ARE SOME EVENTS MORE RECALLABLE THAN OTHERS
复制标题

DOI:
10.3758/bf03197022
复制
发表时间:
1987-03-01
期刊:
影响因子:
2.4
通讯作者:
MANTINIATKINSON, T
MANTINIATKINSON, T
中科院分区:
心理学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
COHEN, RL;PETERSON, M;MANTINIATKINSON, T

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

通过五个实验研究了动作事件自由回忆的项目间差异。动作事件以三种不同的形式呈现:受试者根据实验者的口头指令执行的微型任务(SPTS)、实验者执行的微型任务(EPTS)和任务指令(TI)。回忆概率的可靠事件间差异不仅表现在每种格式内,而且这些差异往往在不同格式之间相关,特别是在SPTS和EPT之间;因此,高度可回忆的SPT也往往是高度可回忆的EPT。试图用熟悉度、鲜活程度和环境线索的可获得性来解释项目间回忆的差异,但基本上没有成功。对动作成分和客体成分的实验分析表明,我们的事件的召回概率主要取决于其动作成分的召回概率,对其客体成分的召回概率只有次要的依赖。
Interitem differences in the free recall of action events were studied in five experiments. The action events were presented in three different formats: minitasks performed by the subjects in response to verbal instructions from the experimenter (SPTs), minitasks performed by the experimenter (EPTs), and task instructions (TIs). Not only were reliable interevent differences in recall probability demonstrated within each format, but these differences tended to correlate across formats, especially between the SPTs and EPTs; thus, a highly recallable SPT also tended to be a highly recallable EPT. Attempts to explain interitem recall differences in terms of differences in familiarity, vividness, and the availability of environmental cues were largely unsuccessful. An experimental analysis of the action events into action and object components showed the recall probabilities of our events to be mainly dependent on the recall probabilities of their action components, with only a minor dependence on the recall probabilities of their object component.