Study of the effective inverse photon efficiency using optical emission spectroscopy combined with cavity ring-down spectroscopy approach
Study of the effective inverse photon efficiency using optical emission spectroscopy combined with cavity ring-down spectroscopy approach
复制标题
利用发射光谱法与腔衰荡光谱法相结合的有效反光子效率研究
DOI:
10.1088/0031-8949/90/9/095602
复制
发表时间:
2015-08
期刊:
影响因子:
2.9
通讯作者:
Wu XW
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Wu Xingwei;Li Cong;Wang Yong;Wang Zhiwei;Feng Chunlei;Ding Hongbin;Wu XW
The hydrocarbon impurities formation is inevitable due to wall erosion in a long pulse high performance scenario with carbon-based plasma facing materials in fusion devices. The standard procedure to determine the chemical erosion yield in situ is by means of inverse photon efficiency D/XB. In this work, the conversion factor between CH4 flux and photon flux of CH A → X transition (effective inverse photon efficiency PE−1) was measured directly using a cascaded arc plasma simulator with argon/methane. This study shows that the measured PE−1 is different from the calculated D/XB. We compared the photon flux measured by optical emission spectroscopy (OES) and calculated by electron impact excitation of CH(X) which was diagnosed by cavity ring-down spectroscopy (CRDS). It seems that charge exchange and dissociative recombination processes are the main channels of CH(A) production and removal which lead to the inconsistency of PE −1 and D/XB at lower temperature. Meanwhile, the fraction of excited CH(A) produced by dissociative recombination processes was investigated, and we found it increased with Te in the range from 4% to 13% at Te < 1 eV. Our work suggests that the CH spectroscopy should be reinterpreted and the conversion factor should have a new definition instead of D/XB since the electron impact excitation is not the only channel of CH(A) production. These results have an effect on evaluating the yield of chemical erosion in divertor of fusion device.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
3.1
作者:
U. Fantz;S. Meir
通讯作者:
U. Fantz;S. Meir
影响因子:
2.9
作者:
S. Brezinsek;R. Pugno;U. Fantz;A. Manhard;H. W. Müller;A. Kallenbach;P. Mertens
通讯作者:
S. Brezinsek;R. Pugno;U. Fantz;A. Manhard;H. W. Müller;A. Kallenbach;P. Mertens
影响因子:
1.7
作者:
Li Cong;Zhang Jia-liang;Yao Zhi;W. Xingwei;Zhang Chenfei;Ding Hongbin
通讯作者:
Li Cong;Zhang Jia-liang;Yao Zhi;W. Xingwei;Zhang Chenfei;Ding Hongbin
影响因子:
2.2
作者:
Janev, RK;Reiter, D
通讯作者:
Reiter, D
影响因子:
3.3
作者:
J. Westerhout;D. Borodin;S. Brezinsek;N. Lopes Cardozo;J. Rapp;D. Schram;G. van Rooij
通讯作者:
J. Westerhout;D. Borodin;S. Brezinsek;N. Lopes Cardozo;J. Rapp;D. Schram;G. van Rooij