Multislice dark-blood carotid artery wall imaging: A 1.5 T and 3.0 T comparison

Multislice dark-blood carotid artery wall imaging: A 1.5 T and 3.0 T comparison
复制标题

DOI:
10.1002/jmri.20563
复制
发表时间:
2006-05-01
影响因子:
4.4
通讯作者:
Li, DB
Li, DB
中科院分区:
医学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Koktzoglou, I;Chung, YC;Li, DB

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

目的:比较1.5 T和3.0 T下两种多层螺旋快速自旋回波(TSE)颈动脉壁成像技术,并研究3.0 T下更高空间分辨率颈动脉壁成像的可行性。材料和方法:多层质子密度加权(PDW)、T2加权(T2 W),和T1加权(T1 W)流入/流出饱和带(IOSB)和快速扩展覆盖双反转恢复(REX-REV)在1.5 T和3.0 T下,使用时间、覆盖范围和空间分辨率匹配(0.47 x 0.47 x 3 mm(3))的成像方案,对6名健康志愿者进行TSE颈动脉壁成像。为了研究3.0 T下改善的信噪比(SNR)是否可以提高空间分辨率,在3.0 T下进行了更高空间分辨率成像(0.31 x 0.31 x 3 mm(3))。结果:3.0T相对于1.5T时,颈动脉壁SNR(223%)和壁腔CNR(255%)在一次采集中有显著性差异(P < 0.025)。IOSB和REX-OCT图像的SNR和CNR有不同程度的差异(P < 0.05),IOSB值较大。标准化到一个共同的冲洗时间,在3.0 T和1.5 T的较低的空间分辨率成像提供了相似的水平的壁腔CNR(P = NS)。结论:多层颈动脉壁成像在3.0 T与IOSB和REX-THERM的好处,从改善SNR和CNR相对于1.5 T,并允许更高的空间分辨率颈动脉壁成像。
Purpose: To compare two multislice turbo spin-echo (TSE) carotid artery wall imaging techniques at 1.5 T and 3.0 T, and to investigate the feasibility of higher spatial resolution carotid artery wall imaging at 3.0 T.Materials and Methods: Multislice proton density-weighted (PDW), T2-weighted (T2W), and T1-weighted (T1W) inflow/outflow saturation band (IOSB) and rapid extended coverage double inversion-recovery (REX-DIR) TSE carotid artery wall imaging was performed on six healthy volunteers at 1.5 T and 3.0 T using time-, coverage-, and spatial resolution-matched (0.47 x 0.47 x 3 mm(3)) imaging protocols. To investigate whether improved signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at 3.0 T could allow for improved spatial resolution, higher spatial resolution imaging (0.31 x 0.31 x 3 mm(3)) was performed at 3.0 T. Carotid artery wall SNR, carotid lumen SNR, and wall-lumen contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were measured.Results: Signal gain at 3.0 Trelative to 1.5T was observed for carotid artery wall SNR (223%) and wall-lumen CNR (255%) in an acquisitions (P < 0.025). IOSB and REX-DIR images were found to have different levels of SNR and CNR (P < 0.05) with IOSB values observed to be larger. Normalized to a common irriaging time, the higher spatial resolution imaging at 3.0 T and the lower spatial resolution imaging at 1.5 T provided similar levels of wall-lumen CNR (P = NS).Conclusion: Multislice carotid wall imaging at 3.0 T with IOSB and REX-DIR benefits from improved SNR and CNR relative to 1.5 T, and allows for higher spatial resolution carotid artery wall imaging.