A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: Interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships
A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: Interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/0021-9010.87.5.819
复制
发表时间：
2002-10-01
影响因子：
9.9
通讯作者：
Beaubien, JM
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Gully, SM;Incalcaterra, KA;Beaubien, JM
元分析技术被用来检查水平的分析和相互依存的主持人之间的关系观察到的任务特定的团队效能，广义的潜力，和性能。识别并荟萃分析了67项实证研究，产生256个效应量。结果表明，关系是主持水平的分析。团队水平的效应量（rho = 0.39）比个人水平的效应量（rho = 0.20）更强。在团队层面，团队效能和效力都与绩效呈正相关（rhos分别= 0.41和0.37）。相互依赖显著调节团队效能与绩效之间的关系，但不调节效能与绩效之间的关系。团队效能和绩效之间的关系更强时，相互依存度高（rho = 0.45）比当它是低的（rho = 0.34）。
Meta-analytic techniques were used to examine level of analysis and interdependence as moderators of observed relationships between task-specific team-efficacy, generalized potency, and performance. Sixty-seven empirical studies yielding 256 effect sizes were identified and meta-analyzed. Results demonstrated that relationships are moderated by level of analysis. Effect sizes were stronger at the team level (rho = .39) than at the individual level (rho = .20). At the team level, both team-efficacy and potency had positive relationships with performance (rhos = .41 and .37, respectively). Interdependence significantly moderated the relationship between team-efficacy and performance, but not between potency and performance. The relationship between team-efficacy and performance was stronger when interdependence was high (rho = .45) than when it was low (rho = .34).