Coordination of resources at the edge of the electricity grid: systematic review and taxonomy
Coordination of resources at the edge of the electricity grid: systematic review and taxonomy
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119188
复制
发表时间：
2022-02
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
F. Charbonnier;Thomas Morstyn;M. Mcculloch
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
F. Charbonnier;Thomas Morstyn;M. Mcculloch
本文基于对关键文献趋势的系统分析，提出了一种新的电网边缘分布式能源协调策略分类法。分布式能源（例如分散式发电和灵活性来源）的协调对于电力脱碳和实现气候目标至关重要。有关该主题的文献呈指数级增长；然而，迄今为止使用的术语存在含糊之处。我们试图通过基于机构、信息和游戏类型将协调策略的类别综合到一种新颖的详尽的、相互排斥的分类法中来解决这种缺乏清晰度的问题。通过使用结构化主题搜索查询对 84,741 篇出版物进行系统文献综述，说明了这些概念在文献中的相关性。然后对 93 个选定的协调策略进行了更详细的分析，并将其映射到该框架上。结构假设的清晰性是针对能源系统内不同情况选择适当协调策略的关键。我们认为，需要多种互补策略来协调能源系统的不同组成部分并实现深度脱碳。
This paper proposes a novel taxonomy of coordination strategies for distributed energy resources at the edge of the electricity grid, based on a systematic analysis of key literature trends. The coordination of distributed energy resources such as decentralised generation and flexibility sources is critical for decarbonising electricity and achieving climate goals. The literature on the topic is growing exponentially; however, there is ambiguity in the terminology used to date. We seek to resolve this lack of clarity by synthesising the categories of coordination strategies in a novel exhaustive, mutually exclusive taxonomy based on agency, information and game type. The relevance of these concepts in the literature is illustrated through a systematic literature review of 84,741 publications using a structured topic search query. Then 93 selected coordination strategies are analysed in more detail and mapped onto this framework. Clarity on structural assumptions is key for selecting appropriate coordination strategies for differing contexts within energy systems. We argue that a plurality of complementary strategies is needed to coordinate energy systems’ different components and achieve deep decarbonisation.