On the Security of a Repaired Mental Poker Protocol

On the Security of a Repaired Mental Poker Protocol
复制标题

论修复心理扑克协议的安全性

DOI:
10.1109/itng.2006.103
复制
发表时间:
2006
期刊:
Third International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations (ITNG'06)
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
F. Sebé
F. Sebé
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Jordi Castellà;J. Domingo;F. Sebé

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

在2003年,Zhao,Varadharajan和Mu提出了一个心理扑克协议,其安全性在2004年被证明是有缺陷的:任何玩家(或任何知道牌组编码的局外人)都能够在不知道加密密钥的情况下解密加密的牌。2005年,前两位作者发表了这个无TTP的心理扑克协议的修复版本。我们在这里展示了第二个版本也有缺陷:第一个玩家可以找到最终加密的洗牌牌的所有明文。这两个协议都类似于Shamir-Rivest-Adleman的心理扑克,但它们用ElGamal类交换密码取代了指数交换密码。我们得出结论,改变底层的交换密码是他们的弱点的原因
In 2003, Zhao, Varadharajan and Mu proposed a mental poker protocol whose security was shown to be flawed in 2004: any player (or any outsider knowing the deck coding) is able to decrypt encrypted cards without knowing the encryption key. In 2005, the first two authors published a repaired version of this TTP-free mental poker protocol. We show here that this second version is also flawed: the first player can find all cleartexts of the final encrypted shuffled deck of cards. Both protocols are similar to Shamir-Rivest-Adleman's mental poker, but they replace an exponential commutative cipher with an ElGamal-like commutative cipher. We conclude that changing the underlying commutative cipher is the reason of their weakness