Differences in Cognitive Profile between TIA, Stroke and Elderly Memory Research Subjects: A Comparison of the MMSE and MoCA

Differences in Cognitive Profile between TIA, Stroke and Elderly Memory Research Subjects: A Comparison of the MMSE and MoCA
复制标题

DOI:
10.1159/000338905
复制
发表时间:
2012-01-01
影响因子:
2.9
通讯作者:
Rothwell, P. M.
Rothwell, P. M.
中科院分区:
医学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Pendlebury, S. T.;Markwick, A.;Rothwell, P. M.

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

背景:蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)似乎比迷你精神状态检查(MMSE)对轻度认知障碍(MCI)更敏感:超过50%的TIA和卒中患者MMSE评分为>= 27(“正常”认知功能)在>=指数事件后6个月,评分= 24)具有不同的临床特征:TIA和卒中队列中额叶/执行功能缺陷预计普遍存在,记忆研究队列。方法:在索引事件发生6个月或更长时间后,在一项基于人群的研究(牛津血管研究)中对连续的TIA或中风患者进行MMSE和MoCA,并在一项记忆研究队列(牛津研究记忆和衰老项目)中对连续的受试者进行MMSE和MoCA。中重度认知功能障碍患者(MMSE评分= 27)。结论:与MMSE相比,MoCA在TIA、卒中和记忆研究对象之间的认知特征差异更大。即使在MMSE正常的人群中,MoCA也显示出组间差异,因此似乎是评估MCI患者认知能力的一个有用的简短工具,特别是在MMSE的天花板效应存在问题的情况下。巴塞尔S. Karger股份有限公司版权所有
Background: The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) appears more sensitive to mild cognitive impairment (MCI) than the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE): over 50% of TIA and stroke patients with an MMSE score of >= 27 ('normal' cognitive function) at >= 6 months after index event, score = 24) with differing clinical characteristics: a TIA and stroke cohort in which frontal/executive deficits were expected to be prevalent and a memory research cohort. Methods: The MMSE and MoCA were done on consecutive patients with TIA or stroke in a population-based study (Oxford Vascular Study) 6 months or more after the index event and on consecutive subjects enrolled in a memory research cohort (the Oxford Project to Investigate Memory and Ageing). Patients with moderate-to-severe cognitive impairment (MMSE score of = 27. Conclusions: The MoCA demonstrated more differences in cognitive profile between TIA, stroke and memory research subjects without major cognitive impairment than the MMSE. The MoCA showed between-group differences even in those with normal MMSE and would thus appear to be a useful brief tool to assess cognition in those with MCI, particularly where the ceiling effect of the MMSE is problematic. Copyright (C) 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel