Conflict, error likelihood, and RT: Response to Brown & Yeung et al.

Conflict, error likelihood, and RT: Response to Brown & Yeung et al.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.04.027
复制
发表时间:
2011-07-15
期刊:
影响因子:
5.7
通讯作者:
Hirsch J
Hirsch J
中科院分区:
医学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Grinband J;Savitskaya J;Wager TD;Teichert T;Ferrera VP;Hirsch J

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

我们要感谢我们的审稿人和我们论文评论的作者。尽管我们在科学上可能存在分歧,但评论中提出的批评无疑将提高我们对决策的神经基础的理解,并为未来的实验提供跳板。在我们的回应中,我们澄清了为什么我们的数据与Brown和Yeung等人分别提出的错误可能性和冲突监测模型不兼容。
We would like to thank our reviewers and the authors of the commentaries on our paper. Though we may have scientific differences, the criticisms raised in the commentaries will undoubtedly improve our understanding of the neural basis of decision making and provide a springboard for future experiments. In our response, we clarify why our data are incompatible with both the error likelihood and the conflict monitoring models presented by Brown and by Yeung et al., respectively.