The L2-acquisition of the German particle doch
The L2-acquisition of the German particle doch
复制标题
L2-收购德国粒子doch
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2016
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Verena M. Wottrich
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
L. Hogeweg;Helen de Hoop;S. Ramachers;Frans W. P. van der Slik;Verena M. Wottrich
摘要语篇助词是二语学习者的一大难点。有人认为，这种困难是由于学习者的母语中缺乏对等概念造成的。在这篇文章中，我们比较收购的德语粒子doch的发言者荷兰语和发言者与母语以外的荷兰语。和德语一样，荷兰语也有丰富的话语助词，其中一个可以被认为是doch：toch的同源词。我们进行了我们的调查，通过在线完形填空测试85名荷兰学生的德语和76名德语学习者的第一语言以外的荷兰语。我们测试了五个不同的功能，其中一些重叠的功能，荷兰toch和一些没有。我们的研究结果表明，这是有益的，在一个人的母语相似的粒子，但我们没有发现证据表明，这是额外的好处，有形式意义的L1和L2之间的等价物。
Abstract Discourse particles are notoriously difficult to acquire for second language learners. It has been argued that this difficulty is caused by a lack of equivalent concepts in the learner’s native language. In this article we compare the acquisition of the German particle doch by speakers of Dutch and speakers with a native language other than Dutch. Like German, Dutch has a rich inventory of discourse particles and one of them can be considered the cognate of doch: toch. We performed our investigation by means of an online cloze test among 85 Dutch students of German and 76 learners of German with a first language other than Dutch. We tested five different functions of doch, some of which overlapped with the functions of Dutch toch and some which did not. Our results indicate that it is beneficial to have similar particles in one’s mother tongue but we did not find evidence that it is extra beneficial to have form-meaning equivalents between the L1 and L2.