Critical cartography 2.0: From “participatory mapping” to authored visualizations of power and people
Critical cartography 2.0: From “participatory mapping” to authored visualizations of power and people
复制标题
批判制图 2.0：从“参与式制图”到权力和人民的可视化创作
DOI：
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.07.012
复制
发表时间：
2015
影响因子：
9.1
通讯作者：
Annette M. Kim
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Annette M. Kim
这篇文章回顾了“批判性地图学”的状态，它正在一些学科和舞台上蓬勃发展：地理学家，社区发展活动家，艺术家和新媒体创新者，仅举几例。揭穿和重组地图学的承诺和可能性是非常重要的：通过开放谁可以制作地图以及制作的地图种类，可以回收被忽视的现象，可以使不同的观点变得明显，并构建新的知识。然而，需要调查批判性地图学解放潜力可能实现的条件。本文批评了当前新的制图实践增加参与和民主的说法，并概述了关键制图需要进一步发展以提高其潜力的四个问题：1）对关键制图师自己的立场和项目的影响有更大的反思，2）承认地图中不包括什么的选择，3）更多地考虑美学的政治，4）通过新的地图项目扩大对更深层次社会参与的搜索。本文还讨论了这些问题，通过一个案例研究地图项目的街头小贩争夺使用人行道空间在胡志明市。它探讨了一个非参与性的质量，创作的地图项目可能会产生关键的可视化通过空间民族志的过程。
This article reviews the state of “critical cartography” which is being experimented with exuberance in a number of disciplines and arenas: geographers, community development activists, artists, and new media innovators, to name a few. The promise and possibilities of debunking and retooling cartography are significant: by opening up who can make a map and the kinds of maps that are made, overlooked phenomena can be reclaimed, different perspectives can be made apparent, and new knowledge constructed. However, the conditions under which the emancipatory potential of critical cartography might be realized need to be investigated. This article critiques the claims that current new mapping practices increase participation and democracy and outlines four issues critical cartography needs to further develop in order to increase its potential: 1) greater reflexivity on the critical cartographer's own position and influence of the project, 2) acknowledgement of the choices made of what not to include in the map, 3) greater consideration about the politics of aesthetics, 4) expanded search for deeper social engagement with new mapping projects. The article also discusses these issues through a case study map project of street vendors contesting the use of sidewalk space in Ho Chi Minh City. It explores the qualities a non-participatory, authored map project might engender critical visualization through processes of spatial ethnography.