ORGANIZATIONAL SCIENCE AND HEALTH CARE
ORGANIZATIONAL SCIENCE AND HEALTH CARE
复制标题
DOI：
10.5465/annals.2019.0115
复制
发表时间：
2021-07-01
影响因子：
21.2
通讯作者：
Sutcliffe, Kathleen M.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Mayo, Anna T.;Myers, Christopher G.;Sutcliffe, Kathleen M.
我们的文章回顾了“组织科学和医疗保健”的研究，广义上定义为研究集中在组织和管理文献中经常研究的主题，并在医疗保健设置进行。使用近700篇文章发表在领先的组织科学（OS）和医疗保健（HC）期刊在过去的十年中，我们首先应用网络方法来映射这个新兴的研究领域，突出显示的主题，出现在前景（和背景）的领域。然后，我们对最近的和有影响力的文章进行了深入的回顾，研究了五个最突出的主题：组织变革，学习，协调/合作，团队/结构和绩效。接下来，我们综合这项研究，强调以患者为中心，动态和专业的性质的医疗保健工作，并详细介绍了跨学科的区别在OS和HC期刊上发表的研究。OS期刊的研究倾向于强调广泛的概括性和组织过程，而HC期刊的研究则倾向于强调情境化问题以及组织结构和实践在解决这些问题中的作用。最后，我们阐明了需要更广泛的协调，整合这两个学科的方向的方式，可以让学者推进组织科学和医疗保健与未来的研究，既严格和相关的。
Our article reviews research on "organizational science and health care," defined broadly as research focusing on topics commonly studied in the organizational and management literatures and conducted in health care settings. Using almost 700 articles published in leading organizational science (OS) and health care (HC) journals over the past decade, we first apply network methods to map this burgeoning field of research, highlighting topics that appear more in the foreground (and background) of the field. We then conduct an in-depth review of recent and influential articles, studying the five most prominent topics: organizational change, learning, coordination/cooperation, teams/structure, and performance. Next, we synthesize this research, highlighting the patient-centered, dynamic, and specialized nature of health care work, and detailing disciplinary distinctions across studies published in OS and HC journals. Whereas research in OS journals tends to emphasize broad generalizability and organizing processes, research in HC journals tends to emphasize contextualized problems and the role of organizational structures and practices in solving them. We conclude by articulating the need for a broader coordination that integrates both of these disciplinary orientations in ways that could allow scholars to advance organizational science and health care with future research that is both rigorous and relevant.