Developmental differences in bystander behavior toward intergroup and intragroup exclusion.
Developmental differences in bystander behavior toward intergroup and intragroup exclusion.
复制标题
群体间和群体内排斥的旁观者行为的发展差异。
DOI：
10.1037/dev0001202
复制
发表时间：
2021
影响因子：
4
通讯作者：
Yüksel AS
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Yüksel AS
这项研究考察了在线投球游戏（Cyberball）中的亲社会旁观者行为，以排除群体间和群体内背景下的移民和非移民同龄人。参与者为英国儿童（8至10岁）和青少年（13至15岁，N= 292;女性N= 144）。他们是来自南亚、白色、黑人或混合种族背景的种族多样化的中低SES样本。参与者玩游戏，目睹受害者被同伴排斥。受害者和排斥者的群体成员资格和地位在原型（即，多数地位的同龄人排除少数地位的受害者）或非原型（即，少数地位的同龄人排除多数地位的受害者）组间背景下突出显示。在群体内的情况下，排斥涉及来自同一群体的同龄人（即，多数地位的同龄人排除多数地位的受害者或少数地位的同龄人排除少数地位的受害者）。亲社会旁观者的行为和“口头”的排斥反应进行了测量。青少年表现出更多的亲社会旁观者行为比儿童时，它是一个组间的背景下，但不是当它是一个组内的背景。只有青少年表现出更多的亲社会旁观者的行为时，组间的背景是原型相比，非原型。言语反应与亲社会旁观者的行为，随着年龄的增长，个人越来越多地口头挑战的排斥和背后的动机it. The研究结果支持社会推理发展（SRD）的方法，社会排斥显示，从童年后期到青春期中期旁观者的行为越来越多地与群体成员和群体地位的排斥者和受害者。（PsycInfo数据库记录（c）2022阿帕，保留所有权利）
This study examined prosocial bystander behavior in an online ball-throwing game (Cyberball), toward the exclusion of immigrants and nonimmigrant peers within intergroup and intragroup contexts. Participants were British children (8-to 10-year-olds) and adolescents (13-to 15-year-olds, N= 292; female N= 144). They were an ethnically diverse low-to-middle SES sample from a South Asian, White, Black, or mixed ethnic background. Participants played the game and witnessed a victim being excluded by peers. The victim’s and excluders’ group membership and status were highlighted in a prototypical (ie, majority status peers excluding a minority status victim) or nonprototypical (ie, minority status peers excluding a majority status victim) intergroup context. In intragroup contexts exclusion involved peers from the same group (ie, majority status peers excluding a majority status victim or minority status peers excluding a minority status victim). Prosocial bystander behavior and “verbal” reactions to the exclusion were measured. Adolescents showed more prosocial bystander behavior than children when it was an intergroup context but not when it was an intragroup context. Only adolescents showed more prosocial bystander behavior when the intergroup context was prototypical compared to nonprototypical. Verbal reactions were related to prosocial bystander behavior and, with age, individuals increasingly verbally challenged the exclusion and the motivation behind it. The findings support the Social Reasoning Developmental (SRD) approach to social exclusion by showing that from late childhood into midadolescence bystander behavior is increasingly related to group membership and group status of the excluders and victim.(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)