Social Cognitive Processes Underlying Normative Misperception of Sexual Judgments.
Social Cognitive Processes Underlying Normative Misperception of Sexual Judgments.
复制标题
性判断规范性误解背后的社会认知过程。
DOI：
10.1007/s10508-022-02350-3
复制
发表时间：
2022
影响因子：
3.8
通讯作者：
Viken,RichardJ
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Boyd-Rogers,CarolineC;Treat,TeresaA;Corbin,WilliamR;Viken,RichardJ
熟人引发的性侵犯行为（SAB）是大学校园中普遍存在的问题，迄今为止的干预策略并没有产生持续的SAB减少。同伴相关的社会规范和认知过程的性决策已分别牵连在SAB。本研究整合了这项工作的影响，研究的角度（自我与典型的大学男性指涉）对大学男性的判断不必要的性进步的可接受性，确定男性的误解的认知过程，并评估强奸支持的态度（RSA）作为一个相关的牵连过程。大学男性吸引到女性（n= 217）完成了异源社会感知调查修订，在其中他们判断的可接受性的一个男人的越来越亲密的性进步作为一个女人的反应越来越消极。被试分别从自己的视角和典型大学男生的视角完成了《异性社会知觉调查》。参与者还完成了评估RSA和人口统计学的问卷调查。大学生男性，尤其是那些支持RSA的男性，大大高估了典型的大学男性对越来越多的非自愿行为的合理性的看法。三个认知过程与这种误解密切相关。当从自我的角度回应时，RSA与所有认知过程都显著相关。这些研究结果说明了效用的整合工作的社会规范和认知处理记录的全球影响的角度对平均可验证性评级和认知过程的角度影响的评级。未来的工作应该评估个性化的规范性反馈和认知训练方法，以针对同龄人的性判断的误解，考虑到性误解和SAB风险之间的关系。
Acquaintance-initiated sexually aggressive behavior (SAB) is a widespread problem on college campuses, and intervention strategies thus far have not produced sustained reductions in SAB. Peer-related social norms and cognitive processes underlying sexual decision-making have separately been implicated in SAB. The present study integrates this work by examining the effect of perspective (self vs. typical college male referent) on college men’s judgments of the justifiability of unwanted sexual advances, determining the cognitive processes underlying men’s misperceptions, and evaluating rape-supportive attitudes (RSA) as a correlate of the implicated processes. College men attracted to women (n= 217) completed the Heterosocial Perception Survey-Revised, in which they judged the justifiability of a man’s increasingly intimate sexual advances as a woman responds increasingly negatively. Participants completed the Heterosocial Perception Survey-Revised from their own perspective and from the typical college male perspective. Participants also completed questionnaires assessing RSA and demographics. Undergraduate men, and particularly those endorsing more RSA, greatly overestimated how much the typical college male perceives increasingly nonconsensual behavior as justified. Three cognitive processes were strongly implicated in this misperception. When responding from the self-perspective, RSA correlated significantly with all cognitive processes. These findings illustrate the utility of integrating work on social norms and cognitive processing to document the global effect of perspective on average justifiability ratings and the perspective effect on cognitive processes underlying the ratings. Future work should evaluate personalized normative feedback and cognitive-training approaches to target misperceptions of peers’ sexual judgments, given the well-established relation between sexual misperception and SAB risk.