Nuclear weapons tests and human germline mutation rate
Nuclear weapons tests and human germline mutation rate
复制标题
DOI:
10.1126/science.1068102
复制
发表时间:
2002-02-08
期刊:
影响因子:
56.9
通讯作者:
Salomaa, S
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Dubrova, YE;Bersimbaev, RI;Salomaa, S
The population around the Semipalatinsk nuclear test site in Kazakhstan provides an unparalleled opportunity for the analysis of the genetic risk of ionizing radiation to humans. The Semipalatinsk nuclear test site has been the site for 470 nuclear tests performed by the Soviet Union during the period 1949–89, including atmospheric and surface explosions from 1949 to 1963 and underground tests from 1963 to 1989 (1). The surrounding population was mainly exposed to the fresh radioactive fallout from four surface explosions conducted between 1949 and 1956, and currently the radioactive contamination outside the test zone is low (2). Blood samples were collected from 40 three-generation families inhabiting the rural areas of the Beskaragai district of Kazakhstan around the Semipalatinsk nuclear test site. These areas are characterized by the highest effective doses of exposure to ionizing radiation (1 Sv)(2). The control group was composed of 28 three-generation nonirradiated families from the geographically similar noncontaminated rural area of the Taldy Kurgan district of Kazakhstan. Both groups were matched by ethnicity, year of birth, parental age, occupation, and and whether or not they were smokers. All parents and offspring were profiled with eight hypervariable minisatellite probes CEB1, CEB15, CEB25, CEB36, MS1, MS31, MS32, and B6. 7 previously used for the analysis of human families from Belarus exposed to the post-Chernobyl radioactive fallout (3, 4).The frequency of minisatellite mutation was established in the F1 and F2 control and exposed offspring, which yielded germline mutation rates in the P0 and F1 generations, respectively. Spontaneous minisatellite mutation rates in the P0 and F1 generations of control group were similar (P 1; Fisher’s exact test). We therefore combined data for these two generations to produce a single estimate of mutation rate for the control group, which was subsequently compared with the