Embodied conceptual combination.

Embodied conceptual combination.
复制标题

体现的概念组合。

DOI:
10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00212
复制
发表时间:
2010
影响因子:
3.8
通讯作者:
Connell L
Connell L
中科院分区:
心理学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Lynott D;Connell L

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

概念组合研究探讨了从旧的指称物中创造新的意义的过程。因此,认知的具身理论必须能够解释这种建构能力,并预测由此产生的行为。然而,由于没有采取一个具体的或接地的概念系统的观点,现有的概念组合的理论不能解释的作用,知觉,运动和情感信息的概念组合。在本文中,我们提出了体现的概念组合(ECCo)模型来解决这个疏忽。在ECCo中,概念组合是语言系统和模拟系统相互作用的结果,语言分布信息引导或促进了组合过程,但新概念从根本上说是一个情境化的模拟实体。因此,例如,仙人掌甲虫被表示为多模态模拟,其包括视觉(例如,甲虫的闪亮外观)和触觉(例如,仙人掌的多刺)的信息,所有这些都位于炎热的阳光下的沙漠环境的更广阔的位置,并与(至少对一些人来说)令人毛骨悚然的爬虫厌恶的元素。ECCo理论根据构成概念在情境模拟中是破坏性的还是非破坏性的组合来区分解释。我们比较ECCO的概念组合的其他理论,并讨论它如何占经典的影响,在文献中。
Conceptual combination research investigates the processes involved in creating new meaning from old referents. It is therefore essential that embodied theories of cognition are able to explain this constructive ability and predict the resultant behavior. However, by failing to take an embodied or grounded view of the conceptual system, existing theories of conceptual combination cannot account for the role of perceptual, motor, and affective information in conceptual combination. In the present paper, we propose the embodied conceptual combination (ECCo) model to address this oversight. In ECCo, conceptual combination is the result of the interaction of the linguistic and simulation systems, such that linguistic distributional information guides or facilitates the combination process, but the new concept is fundamentally a situated, simulated entity. So, for example, a cactus beetle is represented as a multimodal simulation that includes visual (e.g., the shiny appearance of a beetle) and haptic (e.g., the prickliness of the cactus) information, all situated in the broader location of a desert environment under a hot sun, and with (at least for some people) an element of creepy-crawly revulsion. The ECCo theory differentiates interpretations according to whether the constituent concepts are destructively, or non-destructively, combined in the situated simulation. We compare ECCo to other theories of conceptual combination, and discuss how it accounts for classic effects in the literature.
DOI: 10.3758/pbr.16.3.573
发表时间: 2009-06-01
影响因子: 3.5
作者:
Connell, Louise;Lynott, Dermot
通讯作者: Lynott, Dermot
DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2004.01.003
发表时间: 2004-05-01
影响因子: 4.3
作者:
Gagné, CL;Spalding, TL
通讯作者: Spalding, TL
DOI: 10.3758/bf03211572
发表时间: 2000-01-01
期刊: MEMORY & COGNITION
影响因子: 2.4
作者:
Estes, Z;Glucksberg, S
通讯作者: Glucksberg, S
DOI: 10.1016/j.cogsci.2003.01.001
发表时间: 2003-11-01
期刊: COGNITIVE SCIENCE
影响因子: 2.5
作者:
Estes, Z
通讯作者: Estes, Z
DOI: 10.3758/bf03196851
发表时间: 2004-03-01
期刊: MEMORY & COGNITION
影响因子: 2.4
作者:
Connell, L;Keane, MT
通讯作者: Keane, MT