Mediating the Conflict in the Rasht Valley, Tajikistan The Hegemonic Narrative and Anti-Hegemonic Challenges
Mediating the Conflict in the Rasht Valley, Tajikistan The Hegemonic Narrative and Anti-Hegemonic Challenges
复制标题
调解塔吉克斯坦拉什特河谷冲突 霸权叙事与反霸权挑战
DOI：
10.1163/22142290-00102005
复制
发表时间：
2014
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Lemon E
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Lemon E
2009年至2011年期间，塔吉克斯坦经历了该国内战结束以来最严重的政治暴力事件之一。战斗集中在拉什特山谷，这是一个传统上与反对政权有关的地区。因此，政府试图围绕“国际恐怖主义”和“激进伊斯兰教”这两个标志来确定冲突的含义。这一框架通过将清除反对者合法化和将塔吉克人的“自我”与恐怖主义的“他者”相对比，直接再现了该政权的霸权。霸权叙事是不完整的，并且包含不一致之处。因此，反霸行为者企图破坏其合法性。尽管这些批评性的表达动摇了叙事，但由于其分散和分歧的性质，它最终保持了其霸权地位。
Between 2009 and 2011 Tajikistan experienced one of the worst bouts of political violence since the end of the country’s civil war. The fighting was concentrated in the Rasht Valley, an area traditionally associated with opposition to the regime. As a result, the government attempted to fix the meaning of the conflict around the signifiers “international terrorism” and “radical Islam.” This framing directly reproduced the regime’s hegemony through legitimating the removal of opponents and contrasting the Tajik “self” with the terrorist “other.” The hegemonic narrative was incomplete and contained inconsistencies. As a result, anti-hegemonic actors attempted to undermine its legitimacy. Although these critical articulations destabilized the narrative, due to their dispersed and divergent nature, it ultimately maintained its hegemonic position.