Technology and Neo-Mercantilism in International Agricultural Trade
Technology and Neo-Mercantilism in International Agricultural Trade
复制标题
国际农产品贸易中的技术与新重商主义
DOI：
10.2307/1238010
复制
发表时间：
1969
影响因子：
4.2
通讯作者：
D. L. Schlechty
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
H. B. Malmgren;D. L. Schlechty
虽然这十年来大众在农业贸易方面的发展相当有利，但潜在的趋势和最近的一些发展表明，1970年代的S将进入一个非常困难和危险的时期。肯尼迪回合贸易谈判的结果显然对某些大宗商品有利。农产品贸易总体上在增长。在主要贸易国经合组织国家中，从1960年到1967年，这一数字每年增长6.5%[5]。但是，尽管总体上取得了进展，但其他作家在最近提出的一些一般性问题现在甚至更具威胁性[2，4]；而且技术和政策的发展增加了新的复杂维度。所有国家都意识到有必要在肯尼迪回合期间扩大农业贸易机会。然而，农业方面的实质性谈判会议太接近肯尼迪回合谈判的尾声，没有时间谈判市场准入或国家农业政策方面的根本改变。因此，发生的自由化在性质上是温和的。
HILE developments in agricultural trade in this decade have VW Vbeen reasonably favorable, the underlying trend and some recent developments suggests a very difficult and dangerous period ahead in the 1970's. The results of the Kennedy Round trade negotiations were clearly beneficial for certain commodities. Agricultural trade has generally been increasing. Among the OECD countries, which are the major trading countries, it increased by 6.5 percent per annum from 1960 through 1967 [5]. But in spite of this overall progress, some of the general problems raised by other writers in the recent past are even more threatening now [2, 4]; and there are technological and policy developments that add new complex dimensions. All countries were aware of the need to provide for expanding trade opportunities for agriculture during the course of the Kennedy Round. However, the substantive negotiating sessions in agriculture came too close to the end of the Kennedy Round talks to allow time for negotiating fundamental changes in access to markets or in national farm policies. The liberalization that took place was therefore modest in character.