ICIQ symptom and quality of life instruments measure clinically relevant improvements in women with stress urinary incontinence
ICIQ symptom and quality of life instruments measure clinically relevant improvements in women with stress urinary incontinence
复制标题
DOI：
10.1002/nau.22657
复制
发表时间：
2015-11-01
影响因子：
2
通讯作者：
Samuelsson, E.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Nystrom, E.;Sjostrom, M.;Samuelsson, E.
AimsTo确定是否在症状和特定条件的生活质量的问卷评分的变化反映临床相关的改善，在女性压力性尿失禁（SUI）。MethodsWe回顾性分析了在随机对照试验中收集的问卷调查，在女性压力性尿失禁，接受盆底肌肉训练（PFMT）在两种不同的格式。我们纳入了218名女性，她们在基线和4个月随访时回答了有效的自我评估问卷。我们记录了两份问卷的变化，即国际咨询委员会模块化尿失禁简表（ICIQ-UI SF）和下尿路症状生活质量（ICIQ-LUTSqol）。我们将这些评分变化与患者改善总体印象（PGI-I）问卷的回答进行了比较。用斯皮尔曼rho和单因素方差分析分析差异。结果PGI-I与ICIQ-UI SF均显著相关（r=0.547，P
AimsTo determine whether changes in questionnaire scores on symptoms and condition-specific quality of life reflect clinically relevant improvements in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI).MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed questionnaires collected during a randomized controlled trial in women with SUI, that received pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) in two different formats. We included 218 women that answered validated self-assessment questionnaires at baseline and at a 4-month follow-up. We registered changes on two questionnaires, the International Consultation on Incontinence Modular Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF) and the Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Quality of Life (ICIQ-LUTSqol). We compared these score changes to responses from the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) questionnaire. Differences were analyzed with the Spearman rho and one-way-ANOVA. The minimum important difference (MID) was the mean change in score for women that experienced a small improvement.ResultsThe PGI-I correlated significantly to both the ICIQ-UI SF (r=0.547, P