JUDGING UP AND DOWN
JUDGING UP AND DOWN
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/0096-1523.1.4.339
复制
发表时间：
1975-01-01
影响因子：
2.1
通讯作者：
BROWNELL, HH
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
CLARK, HH;BROWNELL, HH
在实验1中，学生被要求判断一个箭头在周围矩形内的不同高度是向上还是向下。当箭头指向上方时，它们的速度越快，当箭头指向下方时，它们的速度越快。实验II、III和IV被设计用来测试“一致性效应”的3个来源。假设每个箭头的侵入性高度信息促进或干扰(a)正确运动反应的激活；(b)保持“它是向上指向还是向下指向？”的隐含指示；或者(c)选择标准知觉信息作为反应的基础。三个实验都与c一致，但与a或b不一致。事实上，在某些关键特征上，结果与先前的Stroop效应的证明形成了对比。（20 ref）（PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA，版权所有）
Conducted 4 experiments using approximately 64 undergraduates as Ss. In Exp 1 Ss were asked to judge whether an arrow was pointing up or pointing down at various heights inside a surrounding rectangle. They were faster on an arrow pointing up the higher it was in the rectangle, and they were faster on an arrow pointing down the lower it was in the rectangle. Exps II, III, and IV were designed to test 3 sources for this" congruity effect." The intrusive height information for each arrow was assumed to facilitate or interfere with (a) the activation of the correct motor response;(b) the maintenance of the implicit instruction" Is it pointing up, or is it pointing down?"; or (c) the selection of the criterial perceptual information as a basis for the response. All 3 experiments were consistent with c, but not with a or b. Indeed, the results contrasted with previous demonstrations of the Stroop effect in certain critical features.(20 ref)(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)