Brief alcohol interventions with mandated or adjudicated college students
Brief alcohol interventions with mandated or adjudicated college students
复制标题
DOI：
10.1097/01.alc.0000128231.97817.c7
复制
发表时间：
2004-06-01
影响因子：
3.2
通讯作者：
Monti, PM
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Barnett, NP;Tevyaw, TO;Monti, PM
本文总结了2003年在佛罗里达州劳德代尔堡举行的RSA会议上由Nancy Barnett组织和主持的研讨会的会议记录。研讨会的目的是提供信息和有效性数据，介绍对在校园里因酒精而陷入麻烦并因此需要参加酒精教育或咨询的学生进行简短干预的方法。演讲有：(1)被强制大学生与同龄人在酒精使用和改变意愿方面的差异，作者：Tracy O'Leary Tevyaw；(2)《强制性大学生有效的酒精预防计划》，作者：Kim Fromme；(3)凯特·凯里（Kate Carey）的《对转诊大学人群的两次简短酒精干预》；(4)《大学生在接受酒精药物治疗或纪律处分后的简短动机干预》，南希·巴内特著。本次研讨会上提出的数据表明，因饮酒而受到评估或处罚的学生平均都是重度饮酒者，他们比最亲密的同龄人喝得更多。演讲者描述的简短干预方法包括小组课堂会议、个人动机干预、个人酒精教育和计算机化酒精教育。在各个干预组中都注意到消费量的减少和问题。短暂的动机干预作为强制学生的一般方法显示出希望，因为它减少了一组被筛选为有风险的强制学生的酒精问题（在Borsari和Carey的研究中），并增加了学生参加进一步咨询的可能性（在Barnett的研究中）。
This article summarizes the proceedings of a symposium presented at the 2003 RSA Meeting in Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, organized and chaired by Nancy Barnett. The purpose of the symposium was to present information and efficacy data about approaches to brief intervention with students who get into trouble on their campuses for alcohol and as a result are required to attend alcohol education or counseling. Presentations were (1) Differences Between Mandated College Students and Their Peers on Alcohol Use and Readiness to Change, by Tracy O'Leary Tevyaw; (2) An Effective Alcohol Prevention Program for Mandated College Students, by Kim Fromme; (3) Two Brief Alcohol Interventions for a Referred College Population, by Kate Carey; and (4) Brief Motivational Intervention With College Students Following Medical Treatment or Discipline for Alcohol, by Nancy Barnett. The data presented in this symposium indicated that students who are evaluated or disciplined for alcohol use are on average heavy drinkers who drink more heavily than their closest peers. Brief intervention approaches described by the speakers included group classroom sessions, individual motivational intervention, individual alcohol education, and computerized alcohol education. Reductions in consumption and problems were noted across the various intervention groups. Brief motivational intervention as a general approach with mandated students shows promise in that it reduced alcohol problems in a group of mandated students who were screened for being at risk (in the Borsari and Carey study) and increased the likelihood that students would attend further counseling (in the Barnett study).