Does accessibility of positive and negative schema vary by child physical abuse risk?
Does accessibility of positive and negative schema vary by child physical abuse risk?
复制标题
积极和消极图式的可及性是否因儿童身体虐待风险而异？
DOI：
10.1016/j.chiabu.2010.05.005
复制
发表时间：
2010
影响因子：
4.8
通讯作者：
Irwin,LaurenM
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Crouch,JulieL;Risser,HeatherJ;Skowronski,JohnJ;Milner,JoelS;Farc,MagdalenaM;Irwin,LaurenM
目的 研究儿童身体虐待 (CPA) 高风险和低风险的父母在正面和负面图式的可及性方面的差异。方法本研究结合图片启动和词汇决策方法来评估在呈现儿童和成人面孔后正面和负面词语的可及性。儿童和成人的面孔描绘了积极、模糊和消极的情感价态。样本包括 67 名（51 名低 CPA 风险和 16 名高 CPA 风险）普通人群父母。 结果SCPA 风险状态仅在以相反情感效价的面孔启动后才与正面/负面词语的可及性相关。更具体地说，高 CPA 风险的父母在用消极（积极）面孔启动后，对积极（消极）话语的反应较慢。探索性分析表明，当图片主要涉及成人面孔时，这种发现模式更加明显。结论目前的研究结果表明，高 CPA 风险和低 CPA 风险的父母在处理情感不一致信息的方式上存在差异。需要进行研究来进一步检查图式的可访问性，以及检查涉及注意和影响整合的过程是否在 CPA 风险中发挥作用。
OBJECTIVETo examine differences in accessibility of positive and negative schema in parents with high and low risk for child physical abuse (CPA).METHODSThis study combined picture priming and lexical decision making methods to assess the accessibility of positive and negative words following presentation of child and adult faces. The child and adult faces depicted positive, ambiguous, and negative affective valences. The sample included 67 (51 low and 16 high CPA risk) general population parents.RESULTSCPA risk status was associated with accessibility of positive/negative words only following priming with faces of the opposite affective valence. More specifically, high CPA risk parents were slower to respond to positive (negative) words following priming with negative (positive) faces. Exploratory analyses indicated that this pattern of findings was more clearly apparent when picture primes involved adult faces.CONCLUSIONThe present findings suggest that high and low CPA risk parents differ in how they process affectively incongruent information. Research is needed to further examine schema accessibility, as well as to examine whether processes involved in attention and affect integration play a role in CPA risk.