Let a Hundred Flowers Bloom: Innovation and Diversity in Australian Not-for-Profit Housing Organisations
Let a Hundred Flowers Bloom: Innovation and Diversity in Australian Not-for-Profit Housing Organisations
复制标题
让百花齐放：澳大利亚非营利住房组织的创新与多元化
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2012
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
V. Milligan
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
T. Gilmour;V. Milligan
澳大利亚的社会住房政策继续摆脱传统的等级公共住房模式。通过引入私人资金、税收抵免计划、股票转让、规划激励措施和经济刺激方案，规模虽小但增长迅速的非营利部门得到了扩大。本文考察了澳大利亚领先的非营利机构利用组织杂交概念应对这些机遇的不同方式。混合的覆盖范围既包括成熟的住房供应商，也包括新兴的第三部门组织，包括金融整合者、开发财团和交叉补贴工具。利用来自访谈、组织案例研究和文件的信息，本文评估了澳大利亚杂交增长的驱动因素。讨论了政府通过促进混合组织来指导多样化住房部门的政策含义，并对使用混合分析框架的机会和局限性进行了反思。分析中出现的一个问题是，通过相同的政策设置促进的混合组织的组织形式、融资模式和战略方向的多样性。
Australian social housing policy continues to move away from a traditional hierarchical public housing model. The small but fast growing not-for-profit sector has expanded through the introduction of private finance, a tax credit scheme, stock transfers, planning incentives and an economic stimulus package. This article examines the diverse ways in which the leading not-for-profit providers in Australia have responded to these opportunities, using the concept of organisational hybridity. Coverage of hybridity includes both established housing providers and emergent third sector organisations including finance consolidators, development consortia and cross-subsidisation vehicles. Using information from interviews, organisational case studies and documentation, this paper assesses the drivers for the growth of hybridity in Australia. The policy implications for governments steering a diverse housing sector through promoting hybrid organisations are discussed, and reflections are provided on the opportunities and limitations of using hybridity analytical frameworks. An issue to emerge from the analysis is the diversity of organisational forms, financing models and strategic orientation of hybrid organisations promoted through the same policy settings.