Conscientious Objection in Healthcare Provision: A New Dimension
Conscientious Objection in Healthcare Provision: A New Dimension
复制标题
出于良心拒绝提供医疗服务：一个新维度
作者：
West-Oram P;Buyx A
在提供医疗保健方面出于良心拒服兵役的权利是一个长期、激烈和有争议的辩论的主题。最近，美国最高法院在Burwell诉Hobby Lobby等人一案中的裁决为这场辩论增添了一个新的层面，该裁决有效地赋予了私营营利公司良心自由的权利。鉴于这种模式的转变，我们研究了这场辩论中最有争议的一点，给予良心豁免的医疗服务提供者对妇女享有生育自主权的能力的影响。我们认为，反对医疗服务提供者所要求的豁免不能被证明是自由的，多元化的理由，他们的基础上，并对个人和社会作为一个整体施加不合理的成本。在这样做的时候，我们提请注意欧洲和美国的医疗保健政策中存在一种令人担忧的趋势，即通过优先考虑意识形态驱动的服务提供者的权利，破坏妇女的生育自主权，从而使其享有广泛的良心自由。
The right to conscientious objection in the provision of healthcare is the subject of a lengthy, heated and controversial debate. Recently, a new dimension was added to this debate by the US Supreme Court's decision in Burwell vs. Hobby Lobby et al. which effectively granted rights to freedom of conscience to private, for‐profit corporations. In light of this paradigm shift, we examine one of the most contentious points within this debate, the impact of granting conscience exemptions to healthcare providers on the ability of women to enjoy their rights to reproductive autonomy. We argue that the exemptions demanded by objecting healthcare providers cannot be justified on the liberal, pluralist grounds on which they are based, and impose unjustifiable costs on both individual persons, and society as a whole. In doing so, we draw attention to a worrying trend in healthcare policy in Europe and the United States to undermine women's rights to reproductive autonomy by prioritizing the rights of ideologically motivated service providers to an unjustifiably broad form of freedom of conscience.
何时授予依良心拒服兵役者身份
影响因子：
13.4
作者：
R. Lindsay
通讯作者：
R. Lindsay
影响因子：
2.1
作者：
L. Freedman;S. Isaacs
通讯作者：
S. Isaacs