Ecological prediction at macroscales using big data: Does sampling design matter?
Ecological prediction at macroscales using big data: Does sampling design matter?
复制标题
使用大数据进行宏观生态预测:抽样设计重要吗?
DOI:
10.1002/eap.2123
复制
发表时间:
2020
影响因子:
5
通讯作者:
Bartley, Meridith
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Soranno, Patricia A.;Cheruvelil, Kendra Spence;Liu, Boyang;Wang, Qi;Tan, Pang‐Ning;Zhou, Jiayu;King, Katelyn B. S.;McCullough, Ian M.;Stachelek, Jemma;Bartley, Meridith
Although ecosystems respond to global change at regional to continental scales (i.e., macroscales), model predictions of ecosystem responses often rely on data from targeted monitoring of a small proportion of sampled ecosystems within a particular geographic area. In this study, we examined how the sampling strategy used to collect data for such models influences predictive performance. We subsampled a large and spatially extensive data set to investigate how macroscale sampling strategy affects prediction of ecosystem characteristics in 6,784 lakes across a 1.8‐million‐km2area. We estimated model predictive performance for different subsets of the data set to mimic three common sampling strategies for collecting observations of ecosystem characteristics: random sampling design, stratified random sampling design, and targeted sampling. We found that sampling strategy influenced model predictive performance such that (1) stratified random sampling designs did not improve predictive performance compared to simple random sampling designs and (2) although one of the scenarios that mimicked targeted (non‐random) sampling had the poorest performing predictive models, the other targeted sampling scenarios resulted in models with similar predictive performance to that of the random sampling scenarios. Our results suggest that although potential biases in data sets from some forms of targeted sampling may limit predictive performance, compiling existing spatially extensive data sets can result in models with good predictive performance that may inform a wide range of science questions and policy goals related to global change.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
10.1
作者:
Peters, Debra P. C.;Burruss, N. Dylan;Vivoni, Enrique R.
通讯作者:
Vivoni, Enrique R.
影响因子:
5
作者:
Read, Emily K.;Patil, Vijay P.;Weathers, Kathleen C.
通讯作者:
Weathers, Kathleen C.
影响因子:
10.3
作者:
Poisson, Autumn C.;McCullough, Ian M.;Soranno, Patricia A.
通讯作者:
Soranno, Patricia A.
影响因子:
9.2
作者:
Soranno PA;Bissell EG;Cheruvelil KS;Christel ST;Collins SM;Fergus CE;Filstrup CT;Lapierre JF;Lottig NR;Oliver SK;Scott CE;Smith NJ;Stopyak S;Yuan S;Bremigan MT;Downing JA;Gries C;Henry EN;Skaff NK;Stanley EH;Stow CA;Tan PN;Wagner T;Webster KE
通讯作者:
Webster KE
影响因子:
6.4
作者:
Lapierre, Jean‐Francois;Collins, Sarah M.;Seekell, David A.;Spence Cheruvelil, Kendra;Tan, Pang‐Ning;Skaff, Nicholas K.;Taranu, Zofia E.;Fergus, C. Emi;Soranno, Patricia A.
通讯作者:
Soranno, Patricia A.