Rejoinder to “Considering the Prospects for Establishing a Packing Gerrymandering Standard”
Rejoinder to “Considering the Prospects for Establishing a Packing Gerrymandering Standard”
复制标题
对“考虑建立包装不公正划分标准的前景”的反驳
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2017
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
McGheeEric
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
McGheeEric
摘要在本卷中，最佳和合着者评估了一系列的搬运措施，并得出结论，有些应该比其他人更喜欢。在这种重新加入中，我建议他们的结论为时过早，因为他们没有清楚地了解重新分配的不公平性意味着什么，也没有对每种措施的机制进行复杂的讨论。因此，他们的评估是不一致的，有时实际上不准确的。他们的分析可能掩盖了远远超过阐明的。
Abstract In this volume, Best and coauthors evaluate a series of measures of gerrymandering and conclude that some should be preferred over others. In this rejoinder, I suggest that their conclusions are premature because they do not offer a clear idea of what unfairness in redistricting means nor a sophisticated discussion of the mechanics of each measure. As such, their evaluations are inconsistent and sometimes factually inaccurate. Their analysis probably obscures more than it clarifies.