Privacy nudges for disclosure of personal information: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis.
Privacy nudges for disclosure of personal information: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1371/journal.pone.0256822
复制
发表时间：
2021
期刊：
影响因子：
3.7
通讯作者：
Weick M
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Ioannou A;Tussyadiah I;Miller G;Li S;Weick M
数字轻推被认为是一种改变用户隐私行为的工具。然而，关于数字轻推的实证研究产生了不同的结果：虽然一些研究发现轻推非常有效，但其他研究发现没有这种效果。此外，以前的研究采用了广泛的数字推动，使得很难辨别数字推动的有效性。为了解决这些问题，我们进行了一个系统的审查的经验研究数字轻推和信息披露作为一种特定的隐私行为。在五个数字图书馆和数据库中进行了搜索：Scopus，Google Scholar，ACM Digital Library，Web of Science和Science Direct，用于2006年以后以英语发表的同行评审论文，研究各种推动策略对在线个人信息披露的影响。这篇综述公布了78篇论文，其中采用了四类助推干预措施：陈述、信息、默认和激励，无论是单独还是组合。对一组有可用数据的论文（n = 54）进行的荟萃分析显示，轻推干预对信息披露有显著的中小型影响（Hedges' g = 0.32）。有显着的变化，轻推的有效性（I2 = 89%），这是部分占干预措施，以增加披露更有效的干预措施，以减少披露。没有证据表明，与介绍，信息，默认值和激励措施的有效性的差异。确定促使用户做出更明智和更可取的隐私决策的方法具有重要的实际和政策价值。人们对数字隐私轻推披露个人信息的兴趣越来越大，大多数实证论文都集中在演示轻推上。需要进一步的研究来阐明不同干预策略的相对有效性以及轻推如何相互混淆。
Digital nudging has been mooted as a tool to alter user privacy behavior. However, empirical studies on digital nudging have yielded divergent results: while some studies found nudging to be highly effective, other studies found no such effects. Furthermore, previous studies employed a wide range of digital nudges, making it difficult to discern the effectiveness of digital nudging. To address these issues, we performed a systematic review of empirical studies on digital nudging and information disclosure as a specific privacy behavior. The search was conducted in five digital libraries and databases: Scopus, Google Scholar, ACM Digital Library, Web of Science, and Science Direct for peer-reviewed papers published in English after 2006, examining the effects of various nudging strategies on disclosure of personal information online. The review unveiled 78 papers that employed four categories of nudge interventions: presentation, information, defaults, and incentives, either individually or in combination. A meta-analysis on a subset of papers with available data (n = 54) revealed a significant small-to-medium sized effect of the nudge interventions on disclosure (Hedges’ g = 0.32). There was significant variation in the effectiveness of nudging (I2 = 89%), which was partially accounted for by interventions to increase disclosure being more effective than interventions to reduce disclosure. No evidence was found for differences in the effectiveness of nudging with presentation, information, defaults, and incentives interventions. Identifying ways to nudge users into making more informed and desirable privacy decisions is of significant practical and policy value. There is a growing interest in digital privacy nudges for disclosure of personal information, with most empirical papers focusing on nudging with presentation. Further research is needed to elucidate the relative effectiveness of different intervention strategies and how nudges can confound one another.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
6.1
作者：
Acquisti, Alessandro;John, Leslie K.;Loewenstein, George
通讯作者：
Loewenstein, George
影响因子：
7.3
作者：
Adjerid, Idris;Peer, Eyal;Acquisti, Alessandro
通讯作者：
Acquisti, Alessandro
影响因子：
5.7
作者：
Brandimarte, Laura;Acquisti, Alessandro;Loewenstein, George
通讯作者：
Loewenstein, George
DOI：
10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.03.008
发表时间：
2019-09-01
影响因子：
5.4
作者：
Alemany, J.;del Val, E.;Garcia-Fornes, A.
通讯作者：
Garcia-Fornes, A.
影响因子：
2.8
作者：
Becker, Moritz;Matt, Christian;Hess, Thomas
通讯作者：
Hess, Thomas